IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] comments on draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-mib-04.txt

Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com> Thu, 13 November 2003 19:14 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA13554 for <ippm-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:14:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AKMun-0005IL-Rx; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:14:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AKMu7-0005Dx-6v for ippm@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:13:19 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA13390 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:13:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AKMu4-00036S-00 for ippm@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:13:16 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AKMu4-00035R-00 for ippm@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:13:16 -0500
Received: from cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2003 11:15:11 -0800
Received: from mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com [171.71.163.17]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hADJCfw7010749; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:12:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ABIERMAN-W2K.cisco.com (sjc-vpn3-614.cisco.com [10.21.66.102]) by mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AOE96324; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:12:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20031113111036.0261fe10@fedex.cisco.com>
X-Sender: abierman@fedex.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:11:23 -0800
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [ippm] comments on draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-mib-04.txt
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <14958126.1068740709775.JavaMail.root@wamui09.slb.atl.earth link.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: ippm-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ippm-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org >
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org >
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=subscribe>

At 08:25 AM 11/13/2003, Randy Presuhn wrote:

>Hi -
>
>> From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
>> Sent: Nov 13, 2003 10:02 AM
>> To: ippm@ietf.org
>> Subject: [ippm] comments on draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-mib-04.txt
>...
>> 5. sec. 4.1.4)   GMTTimeStamp 
>>
>> Why is it important to start the timestamp from 2000
>> instead of 1900?  This is extra work since implementations
>> are likely to support the standard "seconds since 1900"
>> format, not this new format.
>...
>
>A thirty-two bit count of seconds since 1900 will soon wrap.
>No comment on the other merits / demerits of this TC.

I meant seconds since 1970.
I think the DateAndTime TC should be used instead.


>Randy

Andy



>_______________________________________________
>ippm mailing list
>ippm@ietf.org 
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm 


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email