IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv

David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@gmail.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <david.sinicrope@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C99D12028B; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEcHNMrMaoBh; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7AA41201B3; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id i11so1731518edq.0; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=ZjiHSE6D/K8z92yPzyiM5Tl2Jp9/dDHS7hIhvkM6WTw=; b=kEdWRk0gsDDM8orEGSpDpzalNUTkoXxarzkiMumchC4OfJxCDfs2EhjQMAE2ftOCYb Fwc5p67f3p5lF64RuM8x3PVgjOZn/GWEYwvzZGTDZyUR5sr9WJTJDtIwkN24GkZUWVKi lXJMSXqH1Fq9PG5aPwK1cwPIHwIVhJ7ZRNtSSOy2Hid+B+mC9ws+9nEWzZiRq430ejvq NaVkO4osOPkEk22iglVnil55X4DpCQWRRa5SL9ylOt/OJ1npw8ylqioo5cQiMsNyK2xg XlGhthlEdtiiBN8Z30Dc7akssld6597vIZm3RX4phPYVwFK4iaersEnzNpqNYCJCyNe3 Id/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=ZjiHSE6D/K8z92yPzyiM5Tl2Jp9/dDHS7hIhvkM6WTw=; b=bq8ziNXJQGR5FvCuWlz0ggT5E92C8NJibezszvcYaq/L9OodDUHNmrEGp47Gs8TYNG rJv3Ujm6s4dIS7/Qs8OcWlRbpcoa1Czypm9kWxLEEsAedLnc5Eqnb2pDeAC3mNqixhdd P5RRWQ+P9xsw54Zy50io/8rri55lz/9nkiZNniy62otcJJarUi8DUdOlyqZJPiPi3JTy PpLXgYL0zAM5VD+s4s+Fv/ExaKPc8nC0+FNVGG+uVdPgSUQSnIIBsceecHyitzv1NKj2 BEu4BlGzBhAocRHl/AxcIieH0Mkml/MeLaZjvhotg61ZryhIPHLZrNDX/K7ANoBEi31O S9Yg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWyKbVToaoWTZyFIY9czfd5L1DyAJ3s4UjEUblH9KfiNPEY6qUY 5xxWtFwEUCrXUpQ6V0Hr3ho=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyo8alt0V8/Ga2GEDPGsD3PMPsvEJ6AHfWhTTSgzK5Y6rVW/Y2dg1C3HY8CUKUUmZ4Zdfe+nw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:6cb:: with SMTP id n11mr10105053edy.101.1562755557153; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [156.106.225.230] ([156.106.225.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m32sm587101edc.89.2019.07.10.03.45.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E8AA685A-BE70-4455-9AC5-40CA473F78D3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:45:54 +0200
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org, David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@ericsson.com>
Message-Id: <34980825-5D9D-4378-8700-256A239D749F@gmail.com>
References: <C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/G1D_AayHBRKCaxWEpiN_RwAObPI>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:46:09 -0000

I support WG adoption of the draft.  The issues it addresses are practical, valid and in need of solution.

-Dave

> On Jul 9, 2019, at 12:47 AM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello IPPM,
> 
> This message begins an adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv, "Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions”. The document has been discussed on the list recently, with good input and reviews from the group. We’d like to get the working group’s input on if this document should be adopted and worked on by the group.
> 
> The current status and text of the document can be found here:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-05 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-05>
> 
> Please respond to this email by Tuesday, July 23 to indicate whether or not you think IPPM should adopt and work on the extensions and extension mechanism described in this draft.
> 
> Best,
> Tommy (as IPPM co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email