Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Fri, 23 April 2021 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D303A1DE2 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pt-4DZG-fhfL for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C49A3A1DDE for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id b17so34098690pgh.7 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u2oAfWc4AA1F9Qj9pgk3M6GrbQyRjrl77xUxXw++Qc8=; b=C9WWzbH26mEAypv2xBSv9fyOV8pQ0rFxMwVIC+UecOjhlicrjfW3+9twAQKHC9pOzP YLs/GPwmZH7S4V/eiwb+bStmmZDr8pKBNzMEPZBQ7fpLBaTC7lBuXObkmG6EXwTQVM54 ku3O9urrxn8Q2YGyzdkZ4HelN4XMvSI/8iKZJhJrgdTcYVZVdYkzbmJkDSfNJJF8gp/Z cbCa+sOrlyF8ErCfgWtf/PKpN5DZgn/tqwsP38HHKj+fOGV7ioD/FdtPIC77OETGsNCl 7PLPK0zzwxDkgchkLeqnNxfJjzT80gVzVXsoKL3KrOUsCxtJEOq70xGA0DnFiLsduG4+ 6wKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u2oAfWc4AA1F9Qj9pgk3M6GrbQyRjrl77xUxXw++Qc8=; b=KxKVbP5v4KcMygxIzK6FibHXj7fJEmjYu7fLETzXx8HnXHCK4yfWrus+pfqeIMax02 wndbqzjUB2AEGJHdvK2cirl7Etrn6+rdufu8/KH7vxAKd19cVK/eCCHqTfP1uSRLfmnz p88ftctiumpzoPubw90ShMeG9laaZ2Cq2pkitpSlcZVIe0nGRHnqm1eKeJvpSuWTggvY OdeWAia1/huuC56mNW06D0Op8p+r+PwDy3i3+a9hDbqf8dkfSDRhofR/axn0ctSysGWY 6ZuRLYipBXjnATADeGVkzR6NRE9a79cQyzv7vmGHgK17NWXoIYnjeeMAGL8sgJCYKuqA ORcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J2s5svNBcPv8ToJQRKtPWlcBuNbCStrocfIX9KEcA3QMETyA1 eJIPuVLWY9A28NXE5rDwF8s+yXiI1W8/tQF+YGrJonvWKJY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzumi6CWKtdOnmk9MIoxZyWOTiumOoZnNqwktwtnkSQpGQUht+2qBsC3ciinLhsdAXU2j6RgnvCQYuREknZxis=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6c83:: with SMTP id h125mr1396475pgc.50.1619140239804; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0B497121-1EA9-4963-8F0C-7F55502447FE@apple.com> <FRYP281MB0112D09B68E15391127FE3829C4E9@FRYP281MB0112.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <F84F5ED4-AF05-48FA-AA69-94C7C14C3298@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
In-Reply-To: <F84F5ED4-AF05-48FA-AA69-94C7C14C3298@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:10:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3udciiDQha-nxgjR9Wx_Hwn5na0pqOigT=sQdk46Fh2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin <ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
Cc: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de, ippm@ietf.org, tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5cc9f05c0997630"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/Rm-2ffiv_fsBUpglYoStFoWIZdY>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:10:47 -0000

Dear IPPM

As this has been historically a very important topic for all operators
related to capacity planning I support publication of this important draft.

Thank you

Gyan

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:57 AM J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin <
ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar> wrote:

> Dear ippmers,
>
>  I support this work. I think it is necessary to formalize certain
> metrics.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Dr. Ing. José Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin
> CONICET and Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires
> Av. Paseo Colón 850
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/Av.+Paseo+Col%C3%B3n+850?entry=gmail&source=g>
> - C1063ACV - Buenos Aires - Argentina
> +54 (11) 5285 0716 / 5285 0705
> e-mail: ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar
> web: http://cnet.fi.uba.ar/ignacio.alvarez-hamelin/
> _______________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> > On 14 Apr 2021, at 09:43, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tommy,
> >
> > as a co-author, I support re-publication.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ruediger
> >
> > Von: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Tommy Pauly
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 10. April 2021 01:05
> > An: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
> > Betreff: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
> >
> > Hello IPPM,
> >
> > This email starts a short re-working group last call for the revisions
> to draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method. During IESG review, there were
> several DISCUSS positions that led to refinements in the document.
> >
> > The current version, -09, can be found here:
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
> >
> > You can find a diff between -06 and -09 here:
> >
> >
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06&url2=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
> >
> > I’d suggest focusing your reviews on these changes.
> >
> > Please provide feedback on whether or not you believe these changes are
> ready for re-publication to the IESG byMonday, April 26.
> >
> > Best,
> > Tommy
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > ippm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*