Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5938 (2478)

["Murtaza Chiba (mchiba)" <[e-mail]>]

Agreed, so what is the procedure now?

Thanks,
-murtaza

-----Original Message-----
From: Al Morton [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:34 AM
To: RFC Errata System; Murtaza Chiba (mchiba); [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5938 (2478)

Alfred is right again,
Al

At 11:12 AM 8/19/2010, RFC Errata System wrote:

>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5938,
>"Individual Session Control Feature for the Two-Way Active 
>Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)".
>
>--------------------------------------
>You may review the report below and at:
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5938&eid=2478
>
>--------------------------------------
>Type: Editorial
>Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <[e-mail]>
>
>Section: 3.2 and 3.4
>
>Original Text
>-------------
>a) [[ second-to-last para of Section 3.2: ]]
>
>    The Server MUST respond with one or more Start-N-Ack messages
(which
>    SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Start-N-Ack messages SHALL
>|  have the format defined in the next session.
>                                          ^^
>
>b) [[ last para of Section 3.4: ]]
>
>    The Server MUST respond with one or more Stop-N-Ack messages (which
>    SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Stop-N-Ack messages SHALL
>|  have the format defined in the next session.
>                                          ^^
>
>Corrected Text
>--------------
>a)
>
>    The Server MUST respond with one or more Start-N-Ack messages
(which
>    SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Start-N-Ack messages SHALL
>|  have the format defined in the next section.
>                                          ^^
>
>b)
>
>    The Server MUST respond with one or more Stop-N-Ack messages (which
>    SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Stop-N-Ack messages SHALL
>|  have the format defined in the next section.
>                                          ^^
>
>Notes
>-----
>Rationale: potentially confusing typo (iterated)!
>
>Instructions:
>-------------
>This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
>--------------------------------------
>RFC5938 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl-07)
>--------------------------------------
>Title               : Individual Session Control Feature for the 
>Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
>Publication Date    : August 2010
>Author(s)           : A. Morton, M. Chiba
>Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>Source              : IP Performance Metrics
>Area                : Transport
>Stream              : IETF
>Verifying Party     : IESG