Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5938 (2478)

[Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for reviewing! I marked the errata as verified.

On 2010-8-19, at 18:33, Al Morton wrote:

> Alfred is right again,
> Al
> 
> At 11:12 AM 8/19/2010, RFC Errata System wrote:
> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5938,
>> "Individual Session Control Feature for the Two-Way Active 
>> Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5938&eid=2478
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <[e-mail]>
>> 
>> Section: 3.2 and 3.4
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> a) [[ second-to-last para of Section 3.2: ]]
>> 
>>   The Server MUST respond with one or more Start-N-Ack messages (which
>>   SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Start-N-Ack messages SHALL
>> |  have the format defined in the next session.
>>                                         ^^
>> 
>> b) [[ last para of Section 3.4: ]]
>> 
>>   The Server MUST respond with one or more Stop-N-Ack messages (which
>>   SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Stop-N-Ack messages SHALL
>> |  have the format defined in the next session.
>>                                         ^^
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> a)
>> 
>>   The Server MUST respond with one or more Start-N-Ack messages (which
>>   SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Start-N-Ack messages SHALL
>> |  have the format defined in the next section.
>>                                         ^^
>> 
>> b)
>> 
>>   The Server MUST respond with one or more Stop-N-Ack messages (which
>>   SHOULD be sent as quickly as possible).  Stop-N-Ack messages SHALL
>> |  have the format defined in the next section.
>>                                         ^^
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Rationale: potentially confusing typo (iterated)!
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5938 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl-07)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Individual Session Control Feature for the 
>> Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
>> Publication Date    : August 2010
>> Author(s)           : A. Morton, M. Chiba
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : IP Performance Metrics
>> Area                : Transport
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>