Re: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt

Robert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Barr " <rbarr@cisco.com>
To: "'Scott Bradner'" <sob@harvard.edu>; <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:59 AM
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt

> > for example - sec IV of the template should be stripped back
> > to remove the
> > 2nd paragraph of the heading and to remove all mention of
> > standard or non standard track from the 1st pp - all it should
> > say is that it is the Licensing Declaration - no more, no less
>
> Then there should be a space to clarify the scope of the licensing
> declaration. Many patent holders may want to disclose IPR but limit their
> licensing declarations to standards track documents. (Or more
specifically,
> split their licensing declaration into "wont license" for non-standards
> track and "will license" or standards track)

what about "will license for No-Commercial Use under GNU or GPL style
licenses" and also how about the OpenSource qualifications as well.

What might work is to have several predefined sets of license terms as a
template and allow people to specify them. But since they are printing it
anyway, they could just as easily fill out some web based filuing release
form where they declared thisd as well.

todd
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Scott Bradner
> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:01 AM
> > To: ipr-wg@ietf.org
> > Subject: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt
> >
> >
> >
> > I see no reason whatsoever that this template should say anything at
> > all about the type of document the disclosure is about - this is
> > a template for an IPR disclosure and that is all it should be
> >
> > thus *all* mention of "standards track" (or any other designation)
> > from it
> >
> > note that this template also needs to cover email messages etc - so
> > it should not be document type specific at all
> >
> > for example - sec IV of the template should be stripped back
> > to remove the
> > 2nd paragraph of the heading and to remove all mention of
> > standard or non standard track from the 1st pp - all it should
> > say is that it is the Licensing Declaration - no more, no less
> >
> > Scott
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ipr-wg mailing list
> > Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg