RE: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt

> for example - sec IV of the template should be stripped back 
> to remove the
> 2nd paragraph of the heading and to remove all mention of
> standard or non standard track from the 1st pp - all it should
> say is that it is the Licensing Declaration - no more, no less

Then there should be a space to clarify the scope of the licensing
declaration. Many patent holders may want to disclose IPR but limit their
licensing declarations to standards track documents. (Or more specifically,
split their licensing declaration into "wont license" for non-standards
track and "will license" or standards track)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Scott Bradner
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:01 AM
> To: ipr-wg@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt
> 
> 
> 
> I see no reason whatsoever that this template should say anything at
> all about the type of document the disclosure is about - this is
> a template for an IPR disclosure and that is all it should be
> 
> thus *all* mention of "standards track" (or any other designation)
> from it
> 
> note that this template also needs to cover email messages etc - so
> it should not be document type specific at all
> 
> for example - sec IV of the template should be stripped back 
> to remove the
> 2nd paragraph of the heading and to remove all mention of
> standard or non standard track from the 1st pp - all it should
> say is that it is the Licensing Declaration - no more, no less
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
> 

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg