Re: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt

Scott,

I believe we already abandoned the idea that the same template would be 
used for first-party and third-party disclosures. So we're not saying that 
this template should be used for everything.

I think we would be well served to have a template that is excruitatingly 
clear on how you should fill it in for disclosing IPR in documents.

And for the idea of disclosing IPR referenced in email messages..... have 
we had a single example of someone filing an IPR disclosure on anything 
specific that is *not* a document?
If this WG is *clarifying* procedures, we should not be *adding* 
procedures; if this ever becomes needed, the free-form alternative should 
be used for the first live example.

                  Harald

--On torsdag, juni 05, 2003 10:00:46 -0400 Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu> 
wrote:

>
> I see no reason whatsoever that this template should say anything at
> all about the type of document the disclosure is about - this is
> a template for an IPR disclosure and that is all it should be
>
> thus *all* mention of "standards track" (or any other designation)
> from it
>
> note that this template also needs to cover email messages etc - so
> it should not be document type specific at all
>
> for example - sec IV of the template should be stripped back to remove the
> 2nd paragraph of the heading and to remove all mention of
> standard or non standard track from the 1st pp - all it should
> say is that it is the Licensing Declaration - no more, no less
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
>

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg