Re: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
To: <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ipr-template-02.txt

> Scott,
>
> Scott Bradner wrote:
> >
> > I see no reason whatsoever that this template should say anything at
> > all about the type of document the disclosure is about - this is
> > a template for an IPR disclosure and that is all it should be
>
> Disclosures need to be specific. draft-ietf-ipr-technology-rights
> already expands the scope of disclosures from RFC 2026, which I
> rather expect will be an issue at Last Call. We should at least
> be explicit about the scope in the disclosure template

I would rather recraft the workflow process in RFC2026.

>
> > thus *all* mention of "standards track" (or any other designation)
> > from it
> >
> > note that this template also needs to cover email messages etc - so
> > it should not be document type specific at all
> >
> > for example - sec IV of the template should be stripped back to remove
the
> > 2nd paragraph of the heading and to remove all mention of
> > standard or non standard track from the 1st pp - all it should
> > say is that it is the Licensing Declaration - no more, no less
>
> That doesn't compute.
> I would be very surprised to see IPR holders
> issuing licensing declarations covering (for example)
> single lines in WG minutes, but they might well want to issue a
> disclosure for such a case.

perhaps Note Well type disclosures should in and of themselves mandate a
formal IPR disclosure too. And start a timer for said same. What would the
penalty be for refusing to post an IPR statement once a Note Well statement
became part of the organizational record?

> A licensing declaration, if made,
> needs to be specific, and I expect most of them to be restricted
> to standards track documents. (And, by the way, BCP should be mentioned
> for completeness.)
>
>    Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg