Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR disclosures by unstructured email
Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Tue, 19 July 2022 16:25 UTC
Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632C2C14CEFC for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.128
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.128 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sobco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xr4HaO6xgKhr for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (173-166-5-71-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.5.71]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF6DC14F743 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 922E17B95CF; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:25:08 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=sobco.com; s=mail; t=1658247908; bh=+CP3iEqzvlzTnwJXOm7LqhSGZ7o=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=S5VzzEU3NzrXD5zgtIIOptBmPQEWlp26ZxJLgyrR98G+zmcnLEB7mmK9byOyNsFgG YOagPN+LP78l75YCgpFmenhMtuUvhQkgOBrgk739tWjjoQ4wN0NdNxQhhzn+USp50Y QedTZpGFvcgyNdALP44qXic5TIhZnf9iTNJLGLEwWCUUARZu5Q+i9UPOcKh3Ys4aQr CrEDp4Ntdnfk7I402ByReQ28UE0709KNygr/g62lVEJUgpx5GibC+iSyokeQruafku Ou/TVnNzpqbMLPVZa1swht/66tYH1v6LjlVHjn2q19PkpAy6uQsVlQdAe/I9F44NGU SyalJsDTqrfnA==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Subject: Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR disclosures by unstructured email
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6949E61C-6BC1-4F5F-B943-0AC571DF150F@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:25:08 -0400
Cc: "ipr-wg@ietf.org" <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CBD13E74-1C2C-4F53-A3DC-7A557668FE96@sobco.com>
References: <CCFDE8BD-FC28-4E32-8861-06870AAB5AFE@ietf.org> <X+I2w3vrKZ2rLg1N@shrubbery.net> <acca1f7c-21b7-7e88-7456-5d1fbb0e7983@gmail.com> <5FE37944.3020203@btconnect.com> <235f9c45-536a-b765-c0d7-4616e7ae9db7@gmail.com> <E34E4E8C-EC51-4109-A55E-154DECF18BC7@eggert.org> <CANMZLAbT_3ipDmyn9GkJH3TLxva-rftcUvmeaWWs48w=4T=yGA@mail.gmail.com> <581e9916-cef3-b3ac-5087-a54f45d44b40@gmail.com> <7914fc8f-70cb-f915-232a-fb25b745395a@telchemy.com> <3DAA135C-F0FA-43DB-8EF0-2C1AE6EA0E43@harvard.edu> <5F13E83A33CDF8248A023AAB@PSB> <4E07D557-8019-434B-B094-471D45E93399@harvard.edu> <4526F8E4ACC85DF2EA110E60@PSB> <6DB70F92-73A9-40B2-BB55-354E3CC5C5E2@harvard.edu> <d923650e-9202-3d97-29a4-ddb5df83496e@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <31803187-5C10-4135-B983-16A1FB13FED4@tzi.org> <2DF4A574-242D-444E-A55F-ABD1EFA6337D@sobco.com> <6949E61C-6BC1-4F5F-B943-0AC571DF150F@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipr-wg/n_L_-8xx4NsIcPy_pwjoVghopNo>
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipr-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:25:14 -0000
requiring disclosure of IPR that may cover is a broader brush than requiring disclosure of IPR that will cover i.e., you have to disclose if you think the IPR might cover not only if you are sure that the IPR would cover (your message seemed to assume the latter) Scott > On Jul 19, 2022, at 10:21 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > On 2022-07-19, at 12:30, Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote: >> >> i.e., certain knowledge of impact is not required ( "MAY ultimately Cover") > > Certainly, but that just decreases the percentage of cases where what I said is relevant. > > (Not even sure that the “but” in this sentence is appropriate because I don’t know why you are saying this.) > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > Ipr-wg mailing list > Ipr-wg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
- ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR disclo… tom petch
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Stephan Wenger
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Lars Eggert
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Brian Carpenter
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Alan Clark
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Bradner, Scott
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… John C Klensin
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Bradner, Scott
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… John C Klensin
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Bradner, Scott
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… John C Klensin
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Carsten Bormann
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Bradner, Scott
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Scott Bradner
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Carsten Bormann
- Re: ipr-wg was Proposal to cease accepting IPR di… Scott Bradner
- Subject discipline (was Re: ipr-wg was Proposal t… Robert Sparks
- Re: unstructured email and IPR Alexandre Petrescu