IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ips] iSCSI: Correct value for ExpDataSN for bidirectional commands

"Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com> Fri, 30 January 2004 20:32 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15039 for <ips-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmfJU-0006ZU-LA for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:28 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0UKWS84025260 for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:28 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmfJU-0006ZL-6e for ips-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15036 for <ips-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmfJS-0002UU-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:26 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AmfIY-0002Nr-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:31:31 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmfIE-0002H8-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:31:10 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmfI7-0006P0-EK; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:31:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmfHb-0006Iz-Ms for ips@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:30:31 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA14960 for <ips@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:30:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmfHa-0002GG-00 for ips@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:30:30 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AmfGc-00029k-00 for ips@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:29:30 -0500
Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmfGG-00022t-00 for ips@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:29:08 -0500
Received: from rosemail.rose.hp.com (rosemail.rose.hp.com [15.43.209.160]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CFB1C0071D; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rose.hp.com (dhcp-roseor-bdj055.rose.hp.com [15.23.139.55]) by rosemail.rose.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684F48082; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <401ABE83.1050008@rose.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:28:51 -0800
From: "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ken Sandars <ksandars@elipsan.com>
Cc: 'Julian Satran' <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>, pat_thaler@agilent.com, ips@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] iSCSI: Correct value for ExpDataSN for bidirectional commands
References: <001c01c3e769$05c82150$7107a8c0@winminx>
In-Reply-To: <001c01c3e769$05c82150$7107a8c0@winminx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ips-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ips-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ken,

I am not sure we need to restrict the wording
to commands with at least one Data-In PDU.  Do
you see an issue?

In any case, if you have a specific wording suggestion,
please send it to Julian directly (he owns the pen).

Regards.

Mallikarjun



Ken Sandars wrote:

> Hi Mallikarjun,
> 
> One final clarification request, and  I can sleep easy on this topic!
> 
> Will the new wording for 10.4.8 be more general to indicate that
> ExpDataSN is the number of DataIn and R2T PDUs that were sent?
> 
> Is this field only valid for commands which have at least one Data-In
> PDU?
> 
> 
> Thanks again,
> Ken Sandars
> Elipsan UK
> 


_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email