Re: [Ips] iSCSI: Correct value for ExpDataSN for bidirectional commands

"Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com> Tue, 27 January 2004 18:51 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18053 for <ips-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:51:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AlYIk-0002lL-Li for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:51:07 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0RIp6Fm010613 for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:51:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AlYIk-0002l6-Gi for ips-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:51:06 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18025 for <ips-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:51:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AlYIi-0006ez-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:51:04 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AlYHm-0006Zk-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:50:07 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AlYGn-0006V6-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:49:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AlYGj-0002ai-1B; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:49:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AlYGc-0002a6-68 for ips@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:48:54 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17933 for <ips@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:48:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AlYGZ-0006Su-00 for ips@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:48:52 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AlYFb-0006OJ-00 for ips@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:47:51 -0500
Received: from atlrel7.hp.com ([156.153.255.213]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AlYEf-0006K8-00 for ips@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:46:53 -0500
Received: from rosemail.rose.hp.com (rosemail.rose.hp.com [15.43.209.160]) by atlrel7.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147451C026BF; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:46:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rose.hp.com (dhcp-roseor-bea179.rose.hp.com [15.23.140.179]) by rosemail.rose.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28C0800C; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4016B213.1050203@rose.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:46:43 -0800
From: "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ken Sandars <ksandars@elipsan.com>
Cc: ips@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] iSCSI: Correct value for ExpDataSN for bidirectional commands
References: <000001c3e4ba$ce95a730$7107a8c0@winminx>
In-Reply-To: <000001c3e4ba$ce95a730$7107a8c0@winminx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ips-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ips-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ken Sandars wrote:

> Hi people,
> 
> Does section 10.4.8 which clearly states that ExpDataSN is "the number
> of Data-In (read) PDUs the target has sent for the command" hold for
> bidirectional commands?

Yes.

> 
> i.e. It's not the number of Data-In and R2T PDUs sent for the command is
> it?

No.  I believe an ExpDataSN mismatch at the initiator
is always interpreted as lost Data-In PDU(s), and could
trigger within-command recovery (appendix E.2.2).
-- 
Mallikarjun

Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
Networked Storage Architecture
Network Storage Solutions
Hewlett-Packard MS 5668
Roseville CA 95747
cbm [at] rose.hp.com


_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips