IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ips] iSCSI: Correct value for ExpDataSN for bidirectional commands

wrstuden@wasabisystems.com Fri, 30 January 2004 02:06 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA06101 for <ips-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:06:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmO2T-0004IU-18 for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:05:45 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0U25j0N016512 for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:05:45 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmO2S-0004IF-SD for ips-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:05:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA06075 for <ips-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:05:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmO2Q-0004w5-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:05:42 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AmO1X-0004pq-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:04:47 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmO0k-0004jk-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:03:58 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmO0m-00045q-KH; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:04:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmO0Z-00044i-8Y for ips@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:03:47 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA05962 for <ips@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:03:44 -0500 (EST)
From: wrstuden@wasabisystems.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmO0W-0004hu-00 for ips@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:03:44 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AmNzc-0004b5-00 for ips@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:02:49 -0500
Received: from mononoke.wasabisystems.com ([151.199.66.145]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmNym-0004Tv-00 for ips@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:01:56 -0500
Received: by mononoke.wasabisystems.com (Postfix, from userid 1021) id 7FA0840146; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:01:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:01:47 -0800
X-X-Sender: wrstuden@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net
To: "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>
Cc: ips@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] iSCSI: Correct value for ExpDataSN for bidirectional commands
In-Reply-To: <4019A260.6050005@rose.hp.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.53.0401291800120.912@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net>
References: <OF8BE28E7E.7A596F11-ONC2256E2A.005225CB-C2256E2A.0053A4BC@il.ibm.com> <401950D8.6060701@rose.hp.com> <Pine.NEB.4.53.0401291442150.912@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net> <4019A260.6050005@rose.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: ips-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ips-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Mallikarjun C. wrote:

> Sorry, I must have missed that thread.
>
> I wish you had suggested the clarification
> to be put into the spec.  The spec/appendix
> is clearly saying something different (which
> I am fine with).

Sorry, I haven't paid much attention to BiDi commands, and I expected the
spec was clearer.

Take care,

Bill

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email