Re: [Ips] iSCSI: Correct value for ExpDataSN for bidirectional commands

["Mallikarjun C." <[e-mail]>]

Sorry, I must have missed that thread.

I wish you had suggested the clarification
to be put into the spec.  The spec/appendix
is clearly saying something different (which
I am fine with).
-- 
Mallikarjun

Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
Networked Storage Architecture
Network Storage Solutions
Hewlett-Packard MS 5668
Roseville CA 95747
cbm [at] rose.hp.com


[e-mail] wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Mallikarjun C. wrote:
> 
> 
>>Not sure why the initiator needs to be reported on the
>>total # of R2Ts in the final response....I presume
>>any mismatch in R2Ts is already factored into the status.
>>
>>_If_ we indeed want to include R2Ts, I think it would be
>>necessary to make changes (10.4.8, E.2.2, and perhaps 6)
>>because I believe the current spec semantics are clear
>>that R2Ts are not included.
> 
> 
> While I'll be honest that I don't understand _why_ R2Ts are factored into
> the DataSN space along with Data-In PDUs, I've understood they were
> comingled for over a year. I think it was about 16 months ago I asked
> about this (before draft 20), and Julian explained that they shared the
> same space.
> 
> So I don't think it's supposed to be something new.
> 
> Take care,
> 
> Bill



_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips