[IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com> Thu, 17 September 2009 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AF13A67AB for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.48
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.48 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O6cl-+W2m6n1 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (dlpdemo.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CA83A67F9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-CheckPoint: {4AB29B27-3-14201DC2-FFFF}
Received: by dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (Postfix, from userid 105) id 49C3629C008; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:28:15 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295BB29C007 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:28:15 +0300 (IDT)
X-CheckPoint: {4AB29B27-0-14201DC2-FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n8HKSESr003794 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:28:14 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:28:14 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:28:12 +0300
Thread-Topic: WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01
Thread-Index: Aco3tm1PwjhKz10dR12UPAjGGViKfwAHoecg
Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80190AD328329@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:27:25 -0000

This is to begin a 2 week working group last call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01. The target status for this document is Informational.

Please send your comments to the ipsec list by Oct. 1, 2009, as follow-ups to this message.

Note that this document has had very little review until now. We will only progress it as a WG document if we have at least 3 non-editor, non-WG chair reviewers who have read it and approve of it. And yes, this means the pseudocode, too. There has been strong support of ESP-null detection, so this document is likely to be widely implemented. Your review will mean a lot to the technical quality of this document.

Please clearly indicate the position of any issue in the Internet Draft, and if possible provide alternative text. Please also indicate the nature or severity of the error or correction, e.g. major technical, minor technical, nit, so that we can quickly judge the extent of problems with the document.

The document can be accessed here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

Thanks,
            Yaron


Email secured by Check Point

Email secured by Check Point