IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 13 October 2009 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC6C3A6975 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wWEkHbehScCp for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AB93A696B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (sn87.proper.com [75.101.18.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n9DK6l6f083625 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:06:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624083dc6fa8db006a6@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <20091013183523.GC8079@Sun.COM>
References: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80190AD328329@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BD9338E802@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <20091013183424.GH887@Sun.COM> <20091013183523.GC8079@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:06:45 -0700
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:06:47 -0000

Thanks, Nico! However...

At 1:35 PM -0500 10/13/09, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>Note: I did not review the appendix nor its sub-sections.

Please do. :-)

Seriously, folks, the appendix is pretty important, inasmuch as some developers will pay more attention to it than they do the main body. It would be really good to have some folks review it to make sure that they proposed checks and actions match those of the main body, and that they seem sane.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email