Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com> Tue, 13 October 2009 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9893A67A1 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7oh704gQ9zpx for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FACD3A6784 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n9DHTihu004032 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:29:44 +0200 (IST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:29:46 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:29:43 +0200
Thread-Topic: WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01
Thread-Index: Aco3tm1PwjhKz10dR12UPAjGGViKfwAHoecgBRU7DtA=
Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BD9338E802@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80190AD328329@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80190AD328329@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:29:46 -0000

Hi everyone,

To date we've had only two last call reviews of this document. Please consider this a personal invitation to be the lucky third. We simply cannot advance the document unless we're convinced it's had adequate review.

We are hereby extending the WGLC by another 2 weeks, until Oct. 27.

Thanks,
	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Yaron Sheffer
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 23:28
> To: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01
> 
> This is to begin a 2 week working group last call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-
> esp-null-heuristics-01. The target status for this document is
> Informational.
> 
> Please send your comments to the ipsec list by Oct. 1, 2009, as follow-ups
> to this message.
> 
> Note that this document has had very little review until now. We will only
> progress it as a WG document if we have at least 3 non-editor, non-WG
> chair reviewers who have read it and approve of it. And yes, this means
> the pseudocode, too. There has been strong support of ESP-null detection,
> so this document is likely to be widely implemented. Your review will mean
> a lot to the technical quality of this document.
> 
> Please clearly indicate the position of any issue in the Internet Draft,
> and if possible provide alternative text. Please also indicate the nature
> or severity of the error or correction, e.g. major technical, minor
> technical, nit, so that we can quickly judge the extent of problems with
> the document.
> 
> The document can be accessed here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01
> 
> Thanks,
>             Yaron
> 
> 
> Email secured by Check Point
> 
> Email secured by Check Point
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec