Re: [IPsec] Avoiding Authentication Header (AH)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 02 January 2012 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CA321F8500 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 06:43:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wck6aEEo0sIT for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 06:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D10521F84F8 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 06:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.100] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q02EhW8F024840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Jan 2012 07:43:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <12533D04-6B3F-490F-935B-4F1FA612C938@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:43:33 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BB10125F-6A19-4D1F-A57C-00A9442FF744@vpnc.org>
References: <12533D04-6B3F-490F-935B-4F1FA612C938@gmail.com>
To: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: IPsec ME WG List <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Avoiding Authentication Header (AH)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:43:46 -0000

On Jan 2, 2012, at 6:34 AM, RJ Atkinson wrote:

> So it is not obvious that this document is within the charter 
> for the IPsec ME WG.  

It is obvious that it is not.

> If the IPsec ME WG Chairs believe this work is within charter, 

We do not. This mailing list is also used for anyone with drafts that deal with modern IPsec usage, such as the documents in this thread. Are you saying that such documents should not be discussed on this mailing list?

--Paul Hoffman