IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Avoiding Authentication Header (AH)

RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 03 January 2012 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C37921F856A for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:51:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WWETVI8oxZfi for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA42C21F8530 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qcsf15 with SMTP id f15so11420791qcs.31 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:51:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=oxBjx7vR+NnwK3yIy0FGyN8EkQGkpC07L0Jevgk87I0=; b=qW9wQQTWPGIXOBA4SSNVdHOywdA6CYiqPgd4U5LOc24DldURaRWkuqJVxVZrQQYyxf LNCWjFkC/dcL97YEMkcHAwZh3xT3Q5FaKp8jRm8f93V6oMSIcw63E23xK0M1hzS0jEdV rSIGt+jVbbPpB0JXhlJef8Lk5UeGZi39y6vv8=
Received: by 10.229.135.77 with SMTP id m13mr17388550qct.119.1325551873154; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.20.12] (pool-96-225-134-175.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.225.134.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9sm96347916qac.13.2012.01.02.16.51.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA1nO71GwEPX1udyu=42d=1UZXr4bCporb2uyh4n3-t9V6gVzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:51:11 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <91EAB07D-66A3-417F-A871-70C9FFF75E9F@gmail.com>
References: <12533D04-6B3F-490F-935B-4F1FA612C938@gmail.com> <CAA1nO72z3yuOYkwkHCDphmOsVrFtrgq-0xWviY7XRC2vMS9kFg@mail.gmail.com> <639319E3-7725-4F23-9F78-46BB49FCF172@gmail.com> <CAA1nO73JiQTPM7n5ULeFEtNC2fffgxiqN=rmu8Q1hf8aGaJULQ@mail.gmail.com> <065A8A60-0342-47AC-84EE-8A312F60BB5F@gmail.com> <CAA1nO71GwEPX1udyu=42d=1UZXr4bCporb2uyh4n3-t9V6gVzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IPsec ME WG List <ipsec@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Avoiding Authentication Header (AH)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:51:14 -0000

On 02  Jan 2012, at 19:15 , Jack Kohn wrote:
> I want to understand which extension header did you
> specifically have in mind.

It isn't my job to write a document that isn't useful
or necessary.

I've supplied a subset of examples, which are sufficient
to illustrate that ESP with NULL encryption is not
equivalent to AH in the protection provided to IP
packets.

Yours,

Ran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email