IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol" draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 09 January 2015 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182051A90E9 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 13:06:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZdRfQ_6hiOE for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 13:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D546B1A90EB for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 13:06:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-91.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.7) with ESMTPSA id t09L5Y8e059043 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:06:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-98-91.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.91] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1501091527300.27600@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:06:28 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5689F47-B760-408F-A01B-8C5C86B9C1BB@vpnc.org>
References: <5E3BDAA5-B0C8-4004-8FFE-25B91199D7EC@vpnc.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1501091527300.27600@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/SsoZ-cmTjzpnjwljy0zSoA3Gsew>
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol" draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:06:36 -0000

On Jan 9, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
>> Greetings again. The chairs apologize for the log delay on this, but it is time to move on this document. This begins the two-week WG Last Call on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth. The purpose of the WG Last Call is to get as many people as possible to read the document carefully, looking for any technical or editorial issues that should be discussed before the document is sent to the IETF.
> 
> Paul meant:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth

Blarg, I certainly did. I have no idea how that happened in my tool chain.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email