Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol" draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 09 January 2015 20:28 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4448B1A1A37 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:28:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-_jfixsmQCM for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F346E1A1A55 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kJwqf5WNWzCfT; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 21:28:14 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; unprotected key" header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=nzVEuMyK; dkim-adsp=pass
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WE0e_65vEmWy; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 21:28:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 21:28:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39B1809FE; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:28:12 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1420835292; bh=rjXPa60N/geJXlpV2xGSiKvBodht2gK+Y/aITn5dnSE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=nzVEuMyKlfhYja2H4tbGh+Ehq+ovOdcMdz/ilJnDRHhh8VNzW81ysMZWjBMmyGHQq rSKsEcv/dUM2+OwhUgDsnXVrXd9N/tmXBxUeB5/bU0wx1LdoXv/S4aZa9Jk3ZtFIxf RlEgOSFPFXXzm/22mjq0Nx53de91LOzTQS8jyKyY=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id t09KSCmo030863; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:28:12 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:28:11 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <5E3BDAA5-B0C8-4004-8FFE-25B91199D7EC@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1501091527300.27600@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <5E3BDAA5-B0C8-4004-8FFE-25B91199D7EC@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/xOVGxMRGegFdXwteRoPYaATYNI0>
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol" draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:28:39 -0000
On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > Greetings again. The chairs apologize for the log delay on this, but it is time to move on this document. This begins the two-week WG Last Call on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth. The purpose of the WG Last Call is to get as many people as possible to read the document carefully, looking for any technical or editorial issues that should be discussed before the document is sent to the IETF. Paul meant: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth > I certainly hope we can get thorough reviews from the people who supported its adoption as a WG item, but the WG would also benefit from anyone else doing a review as well. Please send all comments to the list before Friday, January 23. Thanks! Paul
- [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authentication … Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Sean Turner
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Graham Bartlett (grbartle)
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Koning
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authenticat… Yoav Nir