Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol" draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Thu, 22 January 2015 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6641A87E4 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:57:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRJ8ILa94m0r for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:57:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateway15.websitewelcome.com (gateway15.websitewelcome.com [69.56.150.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5ADE1A87DE for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:57:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gateway15.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 3B2E3BCC55ECE; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:57:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gator3286.hostgator.com (gator3286.hostgator.com [198.57.247.250]) by gateway15.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2728CBCC55E47 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:57:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [96.231.226.60] (port=51488 helo=192.168.1.2) by gator3286.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <turners@ieca.com>) id 1YEPkz-0005eB-Kd for ipsec@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:57:41 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <5E3BDAA5-B0C8-4004-8FFE-25B91199D7EC@vpnc.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:57:36 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02A8585F-9DFA-4BC5-993E-C30615D1B538@ieca.com>
References: <5E3BDAA5-B0C8-4004-8FFE-25B91199D7EC@vpnc.org>
To: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3286.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 96.231.226.60
X-Exim-ID: 1YEPkz-0005eB-Kd
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (192.168.1.2) [96.231.226.60]:51488
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IzMjg2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/dJTTqeHOL8UEJrd_Z0KgDgJpgN4>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on "The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol" draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:57:44 -0000

On Jan 09, 2015, at 12:24, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> Greetings again. The chairs apologize for the log delay on this, but it is time to move on this document. This begins the two-week WG Last Call on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth. The purpose of the WG Last Call is to get as many people as possible to read the document carefully, looking for any technical or editorial issues that should be discussed before the document is sent to the IETF.
> 
> I certainly hope we can get thorough reviews from the people who supported its adoption as a WG item, but the WG would also benefit from anyone else doing a review as well. Please send all comments to the list before Friday, January 23. Thanks!
> 
> --Paul Hoffman

Just a nit:

s2.1: r/The KEv2 Authentication Method/The IKEv2 Authentication Method/

spt