IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] replacing PSKs: CFRG and PAKE

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 06 December 2018 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CE5131225 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:27:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_tuJgrlk42b for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from catfish.maple.relay.mailchannels.net (catfish.maple.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.214.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EBA130E5A for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:27:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423193E34AA; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:27:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.33.121]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E551F3E3B4F; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:27:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.16.2); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 23:27:09 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Callous-Tangy: 7a0c67df616533a2_1544138829109_2518283362
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1544138829108:3892669013
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1544138829108
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D1D8189E; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:27:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=+OO/ojWg5VMLau HsQQCbsBnNhf8=; b=jpM8PNeER8+BeKxEdgmJzjqE7EsWz4DU4Eh4pQMu+WY4Ek E/BRAbzYym2+L4ZQalkANFe5fQRKZNyFnGV7OhVggNJ/JnyPUGr9HStE0paSrsCN hTIhJ7TGbqGTwZoldk7YVu6My74tpMGNuVhqsiTI8QQCsCCWdVRz/gIA6zp3g=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F9C88189C; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:27:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 17:27:04 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a36
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181206232532.GQ15561@localhost>
References: <25207.1544136532@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <25207.1544136532@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudefkedgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpihhnvghtpedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtohepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/llWH5de-fHyCbnnmM2ctljU7I9k>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] replacing PSKs: CFRG and PAKE
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 23:27:15 -0000

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:48:52PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I'm watching the video (in five minute intervals for unexplained
> reasons... it seems like I've been watching this video for days).

Which video?

> I think we should ask the CFRG to pick a single balanced PAKE for us.

They've done so!

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2

That specifies one non-augmented, and one augmented PAKE.

I think the I-D is close to ready to publish.  As it happens I sent in
some comments this past weekend.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email