IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 17 April 2013 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0461221E8050 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ESO5c1sEzMjy for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF5521E804C for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3HFIeEA017199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:18:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D05A8680-CFD7-4A3E-B679-62060D41946B@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:18:41 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A1A0A2EC-3032-4945-B103-6022A71CFEEF@vpnc.org>
References: <D05A8680-CFD7-4A3E-B679-62060D41946B@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:18:43 -0000

We have gotten exactly one response to this, even though there were lots of people who said they thought this was a valuable addition to IKEv2. Please comment before Monday so we don't have to abandon the work.

--Paul Hoffman

On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> Greetings again. This begins the WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey, "More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2". You can find the current draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
> 
> This document generated a fair amount of interest early, but we have not had much discussion since. Yaron and I would *really* like to have at least five WG members review the document and say on the list whether or not they think it is ready in its current state to move to IETF review. If you read it and feel it is not ready for any reason, please also say that in your message to the list.
> 
> Again, participating in WG Last Calls is a great opportunity for those who are less active in the WG but who want to contribute to the IETF to make a difference.
> 
> The WG Last Call should end in two weeks, on April 22. Please review the document before then. Thanks in advance!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email