Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Fri, 18 October 2013 10:30 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2E511E8163 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9n6mCA3LPEMO for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423A511E8171 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9IAUGU1017740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:30:16 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.7/8.12.11) id r9IAUGbk000879; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:30:16 +0300 (EEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21089.3511.869215.488134@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:30:15 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3164.1365475675@sandelman.ca>
References: <D05A8680-CFD7-4A3E-B679-62060D41946B@vpnc.org> <3164.1365475675@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 0 min
X-Total-Time: 0 min
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:30:22 -0000

Michael Richardson writes:
> I followed the reference to draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-07, which I read.
> I would like to suggest that section 3 more quickly refers to the
> tls-oob-pubkey Appendix A, and that it say something like:
> 
>    In order to provide a simple and standard way to indicate the key
>    type when the encoding type is 'Raw Public Key', the 
>    SubjectPublicKeyInfo structure of the PKIX certificate is used.
>    This is a a very simple encoding, as most of the ASN.1 part can be
>    included literally, and recognized by block comparison.  See 
>    [draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey] Appendix A for a detailed breakdown.
>    In addition, Appendix A has a few examples.

Changed to that. 

> (Yes, add a second example... an RSA example.)

Created second example, this time I didn't have time to modify my code
to actually print out the final IKEv2 payloads, so just created it
manually. Hopefully I didn't make any mistakes there...
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi