[Iptel] Originating trunk group without calling number (Was [Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID])
"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@lucent.com> Tue, 16 November 2004 15:36 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA10626 for <iptel-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:36:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU5PW-0008KN-A6 for iptel-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:38:26 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU59Z-0001zP-N4; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:21:57 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU52l-0007zP-E9 for iptel@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:14:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA06587 for <iptel@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:14:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.222.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU54y-0007kS-Uo for iptel@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:17:13 -0500
Received: from ihmail.ih.lucent.com (h135-1-218-70.lucent.com [135.1.218.70]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAGFDp8j014300; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:14:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lucent.com (il0015vkg1.ih.lucent.com [135.185.173.147]) by ihmail.ih.lucent.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/EMS-1.5 sol2) id iAGFDps26922; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:13:51 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <419A1905.4010507@lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:13:09 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@lucent.com>
Organization: Wireless Research and Development/Internet Software and Services
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Shan Lu <shanlu@sentito.com>
References: <027701c4cb2a$34119910$eb00000a@SAJAK>
In-Reply-To: <027701c4cb2a$34119910$eb00000a@SAJAK>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'list iptel' <iptel@ietf.org>
Subject: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calling number (Was [Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID])
X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Telephony <iptel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iptel>
List-Post: <mailto:iptel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: iptel-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: iptel-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Shan Lu wrote: > Vijay, [...] > I am happy with the draft as far as destination TG is concerned. > But I don't think it should prescribe a formula for originating > TG whose validity is sometimes questionable. I think you mean above that the validity of the calling party number is questionable, not the trunk group's? OK, so given the ensuing discussion on the appropriateness of carrying a trunk group even if the calling party number is not available, it would seem that there are three ways to move forward. I would like to reach consensus on one of them. Let me list them and provide some pros and cons. (1) As suggested by Shan Lu, using a "tel:-;tgrp=foo" in the Contact URI. (2) In the Contact, use a tel URI of the form: "tel:0000;tgrp=foo;phone-context=example.com" (3) In the Contact, use a SIP URI of the form: "sip:anonymous;tgrp=foo;phone-context=example.com@example.com" For (1), I wonder if the intent of the author of rfc2806-bis was indeed to sanction such use. While the ABNF may allow it implicitly, should we endorse such a usage? I am sure with enough ingenuity, production rules of many ABNFs can yield pretty interesting outcomes. Maybe the WG can decide if the use of tel URI in this form is okay. In (2), the "0000" in the Contact URI serves as a filler. The proxy receiving a request from its upstream gateway with such a filler will know that an calling party number was not provided. Note that this case is distinct from a "0000" in the R-URI of a request arriving from the PSTN, which could signify a valid number in the domain of the proxy handling the request. (3) uses a SIP URI in the Contact header, avoiding the ambiguities associated with (1) and (2). My preference would be (3). Any feedback and discussion most welcome. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani vkg@{lucent.com,research.bell-labs.com,acm.org} Wireless Networks Group/Internet Software and Services Lucent Technologies/Bell Labs Innovations, 2000 Lucent Lane, Rm 6G-440 Naperville, Illinois 60566 Voice: +1 630 224 0216 _______________________________________________ Iptel mailing list Iptel@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel
- [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving forward… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… David R Oran
- Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] gettin… Shan Lu
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Takuya Sawada
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… David R Oran
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Vijay K. Gurbani
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Takuya Sawada
- Comments on phone-context prameter (Re: [Iptel] g… Takuya Sawada
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… David R Oran
- Re: Comments on phone-context prameter (Re: [Ipte… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Takuya Sawada
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calling n… Vijay K. Gurbani
- RE: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Shan Lu
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Takuya Sawada
- RE: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Shan Lu
- Re: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Takuya Sawada