RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] getting groupconsensuson moving forward with our workitems
"Shan Lu" <shanlu@sentito.com> Mon, 15 November 2004 15:54 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA04494 for <iptel-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:54:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTjDA-0001Ke-CX for iptel-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:56:12 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CTj94-00080Z-JM; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:51:58 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CTj8i-0007vY-7M for iptel@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:51:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA04407 for <iptel@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:51:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from airwolf.sentito.com ([65.202.222.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTjAj-0001I9-Mu for iptel@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:53:42 -0500
Received: (qmail 8198 invoked by uid 1014); 15 Nov 2004 15:51:05 -0000
Received: from shanlu@sentito.com by airwolf.sentito.com by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamdscan: 0.80. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(65.202.222.2):. Processed in 0.03697 secs); 15 Nov 2004 15:51:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO SAJAK) (65.202.222.2) by airwolf.sentito.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2004 15:51:05 -0000
From: Shan Lu <shanlu@sentito.com>
To: 'list iptel' <iptel@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] getting groupconsensuson moving forward with our workitems
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:52:20 -0500
Message-ID: <027801c4cb2b$17201fb0$eb00000a@SAJAK>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
In-reply-to: <027601c4cb24$f867cd30$eb00000a@SAJAK>
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 156eddb66af16eef49a76ae923b15b92
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Telephony <iptel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iptel>
List-Post: <mailto:iptel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: iptel-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: iptel-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d890c9ddd0b0a61e8c597ad30c1c2176
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Gone thru 2806bis-09 one more time, global-number-digits and local-number-digits are defined as: global-number-digits = "+" 1*phonedigit local-number-digits = 1*phonedigit-hex <snip> phonedigit = DIGIT / [ visual-separator ] phonedigit-hex = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / [ visual-separator ] visual-separator = "-" / "." / "(" / ")" So would this be valid: "tel:-;tgrp=foo"? Thanks, Shan Lu >-----Original Message----- >From: iptel-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iptel-bounces@ietf.org] >On Behalf Of Shan Lu >Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:09 AM >To: 'list iptel' >Subject: RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] >getting groupconsensuson moving forward with our workitems > > >Dave, > >Based on 2806bis-09, tel:;tgrp=foo is not valid. I am on the >fence whether >it ought to be. > >Thanks, Shan Lu > >>From draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09: > > telephone-uri = "tel:" telephone-subscriber > telephone-subscriber = global-number / local-number > global-number = global-number-digits *par > local-number = local-number-digits *par context *par > <snip> > global-number-digits = "+" 1*phonedigit > local-number-digits = 1*phonedigit-hex > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: iptel-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iptel-bounces@ietf.org] >>On Behalf Of David R Oran >>Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:05 AM >>To: Shan Lu >>Cc: 'list iptel' >>Subject: Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] >>getting groupconsensus on moving forward with our workitems >> >> >>Is tel:;tgrp=foo not a valid tel: url? >>If not, it ought to be. >> >>On Nov 12, 2004, at 3:49 PM, Shan Lu wrote: >> >>> I support the plan to move forward with the trunk group draft. In >>> fact, my >>> company intends to implement it. >>> >>> However, I do believe there exists a technical hole in the draft, >>> which I >>> raised on the list before. That is, since "tgrp" is defined as a >>> tel-uri >>> parameter, it can not exist on its own without the actual tel-uri >>> number. In >>> the case of originating trunk group (ie. PSTN-to-IP >direction), the >>> calling >>> number may be absent. The question is then how to express >>originating >>> trunk >>> group. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Shan Lu >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: iptel-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iptel-bounces@ietf.org] >>>> On Behalf Of Jonathan Rosenberg >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 4:03 PM >>>> To: list iptel >>>> Subject: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving forward >>>> with our workitems >>>> >>>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> At the iptel meeting today, there was consensus in the room on >>>> plans for >>>> moving forward with various drafts. I'd like to verify that >>>> consensus by >>>> asking the list if folks are OK proceeding with the following: >>>> >>>> * Proceed to wglc on draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np once a revision >>>> appears in >>>> the archives >>>> >>>> * Proceed to wglc on >>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-trunk-grou >>> p-02.txt >>> immediately following the ietf >>> >>> * adopt >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stastny-iptel-tel-enumdi >>> -00.txt >>> as a work item of iptel >>> >>> * do not adopt >>> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosen-iptel-dialstri >ng-00.txt >>> as a work item. The author will take it directly to IESG as an >>> individual draft. >>> >>> * do not adopt the expired tel cpc draft >>> >(http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-mahy-iptel-cpc-01.txt) as a >>> work item. If folks have a problem that they believe is addressed by >>> this work, please bring that forward in the next few weeks. >>> >>> * tgrep will go to IESG after a revision incorporating comments from >>> Cullen and the pending comments from Jonathan >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jonathan R. >>> -- >>> Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 600 Lanidex Plaza >>> Director, Service Provider VoIP Architecture Parsippany, NJ >>> 07054-2711 >>> Cisco Systems >>> jdrosen@cisco.com FAX: (973) 952-5050 >>> http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000 >>> http://www.cisco.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Iptel mailing list >>> Iptel@ietf.org >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Iptel mailing list >>> Iptel@ietf.org >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel >>> >>David R. Oran >>Cisco Fellow >>Cisco Systems >>7 Ladyslipper Lane >>Acton, MA 01720 USA >>Tel: +1 978 264 2048 >>Email: oran@cisco.com >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Iptel mailing list >>Iptel@ietf.org >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Iptel mailing list >Iptel@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel > _______________________________________________ Iptel mailing list Iptel@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel
- [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving forward… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… David R Oran
- Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] gettin… Shan Lu
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Takuya Sawada
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… David R Oran
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Vijay K. Gurbani
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Takuya Sawada
- Comments on phone-context prameter (Re: [Iptel] g… Takuya Sawada
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… David R Oran
- Re: Comments on phone-context prameter (Re: [Ipte… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Takuya Sawada
- RE: Comments on Trunk Group ID and RE: [Iptel] ge… Shan Lu
- [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calling n… Vijay K. Gurbani
- RE: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Shan Lu
- Re: [Iptel] getting group consensus on moving for… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Takuya Sawada
- RE: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Shan Lu
- Re: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Iptel] Originating trunk group without calli… Takuya Sawada