IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids> update to rfc2464bis

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 12 January 2017 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3872A12940F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAbU0yt_RJyY for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x241.google.com (mail-qt0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD01B1293F3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x241.google.com with SMTP id f4so3404160qte.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:27:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2+p8r15mlrkp1vdy+qrGvEIHTerTH1YnyI6xLtTpXQI=; b=fwzQVzII9OINhMro+b3AGz6oDnIBQdv4O0VxhzED4Y1lP8OA5W6CT2gDQ3leuFZHJT 8bLBrrfvAyb9mjjm1tg5OA+3Ip4IHLoY4AgRLgQQi5/xRbr78/h6po4aT1R+pgkuufJP 1Vp86YTRTRWJfQGcyuxyZLvSxzdB5JiLJGHNdyQMsRjKd4IgK35YBP3KXxuRS6KMoZPw 4YoKIb5CjPqJ7d0Dx7M1TKI+GlJC3WxLz3inQiv1FovtH1x5YYSnN94S8Fi8QQmOygIa Qtsnifp1HiuQdYpV+50Cnmut9r6rqc5PxRA7VLFF5qeLMeLsTnMGA6LE5TxJ4SJ3q/P3 Bqpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2+p8r15mlrkp1vdy+qrGvEIHTerTH1YnyI6xLtTpXQI=; b=mPEtAmPGw+gLGihbbkhmNFfLuk2aI9G9U64lgAehUYdUSq7/QE9ED5fuSrg8UxxvoW o/qMzoyD+uYCCCwuxQCZvKX7+stEyKAu8I3h5Cp/+t837GvY8eR9bxdz4o5/baE6LID/ m/7D47b/5B1orp1h5cRWvc15JM/Ztpcg5PpHX6CXvepuJMAcTbIcsbGSdZh5TFCRudk8 3r0md9VYHt0etXacdFNoYOat4s8Hf9bGvc0U5Q6RDJQEKq8/d23K2/dqVclJ0VVoh9hp LZzYqBuX4Q4/3Gu3edlr+4JnLm8m1BtqshZ35MHg5EFsmuEeADTvOK4DDb83mlpzBB0b 8DSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKoDdAGIP/TeclcLfD8aJVQr2yAEuw9VhEdARlicqoMZEbLMKWKGHu5+d93XL6o+CfqYtPjxXrcKjsGJQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.34.12 with SMTP id o12mr9521509qto.93.1484245659784; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:27:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.60.29 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:27:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0D24BC9F-26DD-4ABF-965A-84C5708B900D@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <1E7F90AC-79BB-49BE-B397-EC829EA95AA4@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0O6gnXZc3qEY7bqkBYu-sx1_erwum2DRwpe+Vv+jmdiw@mail.gmail.com> <7456833d-aa3f-d368-6041-cfdc1ac95f6f@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr1dQF7Cg0mppZVcSXC15pue_y1Qb-GugKY+G8u-dRyJtg@mail.gmail.com> <0D24BC9F-26DD-4ABF-965A-84C5708B900D@jisc.ac.uk>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:27:39 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _v9XAIC09WeuuPN0jU0BlqcJEA4
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqdQbHPR4xjCbYomyDgVyU6=9N-dWpGWJeN7j2-M-R4K+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids> update to rfc2464bis
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/-R5qL_CAY1EwudUcN-USNRDXprQ>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:27:50 -0000

At Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:38:31 +0000,
Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:

> I support Lorenzo’s suggestion to change the text in the -bis update to emphasise the recommendation is for *stable* identifiers.
>
> This reflects what the default-iids draft clearly states:
>
> "This document changes the recommended default IID generation scheme
>    for cases where SLAAC is used to generate a stable IPv6 address.  It
>    recommends using the mechanism specified in RFC7217 in such cases,
>    and recommends against embedding stable link-layer addresses in IPv6
>    Interface Identifiers.”

+1.  That matches my recollection of the latest discussion for
default-iids.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email