Re: Comments on draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-01.txt

[Ralph Droms <[e-mail]>]

On Nov 24, 2014, at 2:09 PM 11/24/14, Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 25/11/2014 00:34, Ole Troan wrote:
>> Ralph,
>> 
>>>> [...]
>>>> as far as I can see IPv6 over PPP is no different that IPv6 over any other multicast capable link-layer.
>>> Ole - In your opinion, does draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-01.txt give enough detail as written to be applied as an update to RFC 5072?
>> 
>> I don't know. I think we need to wait for an update of the draft with the changes discussed at the meeting.
>> 
>> then we need to look at the set of IPv6 over foo documents and decide if and what updates are required.
> 
> As a reminder, we already attempted to catalogue those documents in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-why64-08#section-4.1 ,
> paragraph 3. We found 14 RFCs and 4 drafts.

Looks like there is pretty good overlap between the list of IPv6-over-foo documents in draft-ietf-6man-why64 and the list of RFCs updated by draft-ietf-6man-default-iids.  Authors of the two documents might want to coordinate their lists (I understand the lists won't necessarily match exactly).

These two documents listed in draft-ietf-6man-why64 - draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-02 and draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01 - have moved to 6lo, draft-ietf-6lo-lowpanz-08 and draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-00, respectively.

If draft-ietf-6man-default-iids is published as an RFC, I assume documents published after that publication will be updated to reflect its requirements and we'll want to manage those affected drafts that are in process to make sure they coordinate with draft-ietf-6man-default-iids.

- Ralph


> 
>   Brian