IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Missing references in the why64 draft [was Comments on draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-01.txt]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 27 November 2014 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855831A010A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:55:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QjQbro4sNYB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:55:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5AD31A00F5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:55:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id lj1so5590649pab.4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:55:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HE38FCbLDTZuINTSiwgfxblkCaDtZLAeHk4WjtkemLQ=; b=YMckFu3JKif/digAkNMyOT3yygwBOVXMCbwZ+2abejDjMPWuyVvdgeerUKm7CbwHiA SRd1ZF8Lb9AW6ZrJeQp79L1vR39GWZS6bSyB00pA4qtN6fI3kZw/mUNA+TzzZGZyuzu3 N+aeU72NVarVs40dqXE9HRrcyPco70dWf+hax6ztt7roccjAYpIO4c53KbPCgpYYplHf cyeHL4olcRdSc4NpZ+b4sJkRBMDjvW1voOCmMRomyCIix2InXgltjxvuaxOpvA4OsLHu X1BE/cXUx+olQTnGGfKZB+HfA+65juiqote8jcQ4+G13Ya1tS0RQPnSE2GhHVp8gcC9c Qd3w==
X-Received: by 10.69.31.138 with SMTP id km10mr67641619pbd.6.1417125315025; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:55:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (204.193.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.193.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hj2sm7932977pbc.69.2014.11.27.13.55.12 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54779DC9.2070108@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:55:21 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Missing references in the why64 draft [was Comments on draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-01.txt]
References: <8676AC11-85F1-4E58-9871-43FD04C89AB8@cisco.com> <234002BF-D879-46DF-B59F-1B9D7D76B581@gdt.id.au> <F2EFA1D3-EC86-4AD6-A0E4-7CF2CC175B9C@employees.org> <6267F947-1B59-47B6-BE69-9ABE9163E49C@gmail.com> <1CE9F644-3482-4F74-9624-A3373AC257FF@employees.org> <54738269.8030607@gmail.com> <3AD80C27-EE59-4E69-9C9B-48C5BB30295B@gmail.com> <54749068.2050902@gmail.com> <5474F723.5090905@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5474F723.5090905@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/IwX2SyuFufc-CqKxfN21vzx_2qQ
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 21:55:18 -0000

I just discovered draft-hong-6lo-ipv6-over-nfc, which also
assumes /64. Not sure it's worth adding, because our point is
already clear: *everybody* assumes /64.

    Brian

On 26/11/2014 10:39, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 26/11/2014 03:21, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> ...
>>>> As a reminder, we already attempted to catalogue those documents
>>>> in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-why64-08#section-4.1
>>>> , paragraph 3. We found 14 RFCs and 4 drafts.
> ...
>> Right, the why64 list does not contain 2491 NBMA, 3572 MAPOS, 4391
>> Infiniband cited by the default-iids; 
> 
> We tried to find all the ones that explicitly mentioned the 64 bit
> length. I guess we (well, some grep script) missed these three.
> 
> The text in why64 currently says "These documents include..." so
> it is not wrong. However, if people think it's useful and the WG Chairs
> and AD agree, we can ask the RFC Editor to add three more during AUTH48.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> P.S. I am surprised to discover that nobody ever defined IPv6 over HIPPI,
> considering that HIPPI was the main argument for Jumbograms in the first place.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email