Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CBB129404 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EHpMwRVbRlls for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1101297C9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r136so91175413vke.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6ny14r/Pk3fJd+usqrLRZQv2u8cMyFIO97F1TfVsHFY=; b=fUqDxn1OCpeWJ0DG3IYYN3JUaxaiyFbVcdbjtItUU4mumg8JqbHcmHola+76WK0bJm N0DjLYt2YhnYHcZnGH8SkrwZap5OMzjMsBIEkhpbv4bAziYKzctehm8OGxhAFG37bLa1 61cWoufLhB8H6pFraUYPsWaLUInRc1Hv/eDB0dCIw2UdRURFC2Q2i2CKmV/gAXRmp60h sUKrMd51MCCyqVms/YsLNmDt71tpb531YuyfNRuzMSbK52sHEm1STRGX+suCfEjZspDm AQz1s7ka7VOz06l0hwF0h5hHE+4CQjcl//dNEoTQmSXYmEZk5V9T4ygslKMCtl6OaxY3 vLMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6ny14r/Pk3fJd+usqrLRZQv2u8cMyFIO97F1TfVsHFY=; b=XxD8At7hDtTj/wL/qZ2gA57jrjkSzWMz5V55HwPT4OuVNbHXY4Nc8+wlNVvEZVs6Qs xbuEUAokHPWj4bXLchIH9Z/72uC7eqNdggFPZmVKNeetLi6uO7AGvG0KYBDK1OvX2q8B A63AD9iLEpGSGBV8ROWLbOqVWNsqASj+6dcWgpUYFph+pMOHsltxXDJlNiEKAGrosv1j /kIcRynE6GsjsoTT8ksmLC0bSIGjJc/gYPLNd1ETaKuSXPtU3Xiy+QdZ/Gsg1EGsMl/i a2GZ7aC6thutHgQ7qZHTnMNyMnvyvVT0iij/s6DLAZf75v8INI7BzQk1EZ6NvFY3KLkG th5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mn+6EKd8JtJps7QRWVnRvOhlppd7AEVOKu83My5WKVATLDGTSYo0x1akrIXE98aelzsD7AGjG/uuKVGzbw
X-Received: by 10.31.59.197 with SMTP id i188mr12985572vka.45.1487121998409; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <05FD5283-9A15-4819-8362-5E6B2416D617@employees.org>
References: <148599306190.18700.14784486605754128729.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAN-Dau0kDiSNXsyq9-xEdS5mzLt-K+MYHqoV8aC8jDVREw8OPQ@mail.gmail.com> <8e5c950a-0957-4323-670f-f3d07f40b4df@gmail.com> <05FD5283-9A15-4819-8362-5E6B2416D617@employees.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3B+dw83B0+26oUqdVJE==wHUBwoWzfWBJep8f+=uM8xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142f178745874054887922a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/8ss4bV-J5_L32G8pLA7gNyhYidk>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:26:42 -0000

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:06 AM, <otroan@employees.org>; wrote:

> Brian, changing the 64 bit boundary is such a big change that I would
> claim it is far outside the scope of advancing 4291 to Internet standard.
>

Agreed.