Re: problem statement [was Re: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt]

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 19 November 2017 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9611127873 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 05:34:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlgBdYLnxTcD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 05:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF731270AB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 05:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id i184so5750490ioa.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 05:34:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9emmbXtWqCCDNZDVGc7dCjk4RTpzlnIqfreHXH3aPhk=; b=P0siFOUKGO+LH2XLOCkrAcxUWO/FlazUW1n6a+Cyh85fgW5I6UUbOBz+0nFZWtjKRg Ibo7Z0lH/UxDevqnbinrFDtt+db543vPuKMZJaab6mpHbmqnd1+3xH3uMhal2qWR+7lm sOawzGjjPtILq5jfNhWBxRpxcYByRSOlaAaEYhYYmr6jx535J/xW1EBluMIAuwEwOwCJ yy6Jh7pEOTD+RydJ8A0vuwn/UZUOuAr2xZdzgkeYpZzFceHkRNXWe0IgSbO5yw2e+35T 7SxJjzaHlXMwXqNBspM4knkmUTUtTq5/Zyej4ePQE6JlL25gQ9J+YAwnNn0tQ8VK2RMk 5+fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9emmbXtWqCCDNZDVGc7dCjk4RTpzlnIqfreHXH3aPhk=; b=l7febpO7oPGRzooyZrrqoOqi07ksy8IFEf+mLD7lS1tTGDiX6k5JDmQCbQiOwPjY4B UtE4oz3GrqMhN4hdTCLykIlm5E4o3XvPBilbFefhnq1Rsa8GHwWnuzaopHrPFFuOs3uV ptsB/7eGRvsjmbC1UzUbl0wlAqSjT6e7sPUWSuekFgmkcz1RZhda+e2SDztqjwWrixER xwPgiD7TUMYeAgF6rWpnyvu1IiChYkUpAGxJbjyw8hJXcAz01sNJvO15+9C6/cK4xZJb IOpUq57sOhf/nGCEavJ1VsvTXlmpZ1BP3yQvhqaBG18/HqxxQff6ocm3BP54VTGrLrSt txpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6QqSr7jLTHDdcl3h5C/wWS8aSzLSHQiJqnEnuQP3JP//qF8X1P PZpY7i0+3ihFmlKZEB9JhahqyPvhwgKLezHRtsmijw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYbrIoWMIRd99B0ZhrEfTR8CJfUjI8LwHR14WUb+CaxO99yvaBkCnfslmJOJQ4UWiRL6Ns9DugwsPbhq5eWYBM=
X-Received: by 10.107.53.42 with SMTP id c42mr10500718ioa.254.1511098468357; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 05:34:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <151090059151.22321.3357672601322845792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E838C63E-7612-4AA4-9375-854C184D699E@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAQKoWPcEFQZgU3k_d0gUL4en6d2pyNq1V4RMNZ6HrSG8w@mail.gmail.com> <649be36e-5006-7688-448f-bc2794d6a39c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <649be36e-5006-7688-448f-bc2794d6a39c@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 13:34:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3WC+vwL_=0PeiJ_D85NqFVTCkb8c83x-ZtGhAbSELGMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: problem statement [was Re: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt]
To: "Brian E. Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11449a446df39c055e56079d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/DHFVeHBQ6_jhw2S41SZ_SAlUlP4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 13:34:31 -0000

On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, 04:59 Brian E Carpenter, <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> However, from what I saw, most of it is layer 2 broadcast
> traffic, which is more of a burden for the infrastructure. We need to
> decide
> whether we care.
>

Let's not forget about battery life. According to the numbers in RFC 7772,
on a phone even just sending DHCPv4 packets every 2 minutes could reduce
battery life by ~8% compared to a completely idle device.

>