Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Wed, 21 October 2020 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043CA3A11C7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7V1EZW6n6n7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E163A11C3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:69b8:4602:916c:a007] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:69b8:4602:916c:a007]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0165C2837F7; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:22:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?T=c3=b6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: brian@innovationslab.net, bob.hinden@nokia.com, aconta@txc.com, none@rfc-editor.org, mukesh.gupta@tropos.com, ipv6@ietf.org
References: <20200501110357.90D62F40722@rfc-editor.org> <CALZ3u+avjk-N726U8ZxVrhsjEcXaTC5iwCmdZQYahM+fqhntJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <e2ea372f-4841-f82c-12a2-d0ba2694ca37@gont.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:09:46 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALZ3u+avjk-N726U8ZxVrhsjEcXaTC5iwCmdZQYahM+fqhntJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/K7MgjAUmsegfOznFOwVTr4z6co4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:22:55 -0000

Здравствуйте, Toma,

On 20/10/20 21:00, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> Peace,
> 
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:04 PM RFC Errata System
> <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4443,
>> "Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification".
> 
> Folks, we're all busy and that's fine, but it's been early May, any follow-ups?

FWIW, it would seem to me this erratum should be approved.

One might argue that the "It should say" part could be simplified by 
simply s/scope/scope zone/, since RFC4443 need not rehash what's in 
RFC4007. But that's mostly a matter of personal preference, and doesn't 
affect the correctness of the erratum you've submitted.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1