IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DAD question

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Fri, 10 August 2012 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A45811E8087 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkJGZlvrIqG6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ED421F85D0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.137] (173-167-0-106-michigan.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.167.0.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7AMJLie018447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:19:22 -0400
Subject: Re: DAD question
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <36AA0AF8-95FD-4751-AE2E-A7A3D07038EB@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:19:21 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C34ADAF7-8125-4176-AC52-21BD5BCD07A2@puck.nether.net>
References: <36AA0AF8-95FD-4751-AE2E-A7A3D07038EB@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:19:22 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:19:26 -0000

On Aug 10, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:

> Is it fair to assume that implementations do DAD and follow (2)?

This is the logical thing that I personally would do..

- Jared

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email