IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DAD question

Daniël W. Crompton <daniel.crompton@gmail.com> Wed, 15 August 2012 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel.crompton@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E205B21F86F9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E3A6Ua6N5L3W for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0FD21F86F4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so1563022vcb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=2ejXdohxSuN5qoIaFKKHB8/asV91ZOQi2y9apvre9xk=; b=YCaRlZQVy7yxBGjzzasjbCLwGPAvC/eOLgv6hRbVQnNycZ2O+WqEFwrfUYDzLJhKSx tAwUAq6ZL3TwnJicEibkREQSc/V7gzAczK1h0mn2fsQP9xT2jSxD7M+/JvQyhbCFkwqM /pc0spsJUsaTYoTsJMoyL3paGmdqDuC9v0yOn86s1vmYulTEYKLadyS+I6ofZwUCncJS /8+bV+2WlmGc6Dx6NhTG2aZLr8+14hqa2q9ouAHg2RJ0BL7N8xvyf8l1cZqLNGguc2Md eclHLLAw+O3kkLIcdv3okfVVae9p9thrExw1pDZV/jm6xbl5gCrdDh3kDNSa4BNf/81l xJGQ==
Received: by 10.52.17.75 with SMTP id m11mr10877777vdd.106.1345027231163; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.196.21 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5FAE0128-DDE7-45C4-8632-F56EAA1BE362@gmail.com>
References: <36AA0AF8-95FD-4751-AE2E-A7A3D07038EB@cisco.com> <409F28A1-7974-4524-893D-CEF349A96657@employees.org> <5FAE0128-DDE7-45C4-8632-F56EAA1BE362@gmail.com>
From: "Daniël W. Crompton" <daniel.crompton@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:40:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CALKmEuAqzAsabqs7dMBHHkBvwbAx_UVLgJGJH83-y9wHZKt6FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DAD question
To: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec502d8de53a5d104c74b8ef4"
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:40:42 -0000

On 11 August 2012 17:36, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
<...snipped for brevity...>

> For example, has any seen any actual duplicate MAC addresses?  It would be
> good to collect some data.


Yes, I've seen this for several hardware manufactures. Most memorable were
Sun boxes in which all of the 4 network interfaces shared the same MAC
after unboxing.

D.


blaze your trail

-- 
Daniël W. Crompton <daniel.crompton@gmail.com>

 <http://specialbrands.net/>

<http://specialbrands.net/>
http://specialbrands.net/
<http://twitter.com/webhat>
<http://www.facebook.com/webhat><http://plancast.com/webhat><http://www.linkedin.com/in/redhat>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email