RE: DAD question

"Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com> Tue, 14 August 2012 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEFB21F87A4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5arEWdbLQTwO for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com (blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com [130.76.32.231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DBF21F879E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id q7EIwoHA016099 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:51 -0700
Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com (blv-av-01.boeing.com [130.247.16.37]) by blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id q7EIwoh8016090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:50 -0700
Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id q7EIwiee030541; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:44 -0700
Received: from XCH-MWHT-05.mw.nos.boeing.com (xch-mwht-05.mw.nos.boeing.com [134.57.119.160]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id q7EIwhH3030494 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:43 -0700
Received: from XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com ([134.57.119.191]) by XCH-MWHT-05.mw.nos.boeing.com ([134.57.119.160]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:58:43 -0500
From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org 6man" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:58:41 -0500
Subject: RE: DAD question
Thread-Topic: DAD question
Thread-Index: AQHNehHJckLUSFUWY02BHbyxUsGbLZdZ00CA///VqJA=
Message-ID: <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BCFA48DD@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <201208141141.q7EBfiIe099885@givry.fdupont.fr> <AC13E895-93A9-4289-B416-2A273A3F0C34@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC13E895-93A9-4289-B416-2A273A3F0C34@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: No
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:58:47 -0000

> Fred Baker (fred) wrote:

> The work-around, I suggest, would be to have the station use a privacy
> address instead of a MAC-based address when a duplicate MAC address is
> detected.

Actually, I has the same thought when this subject came up. And DAD.

> I gather nobody agrees with me.

FWIW, I totally agree.

Bert