IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Sat, 07 August 2021 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10F13A0D70; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 16:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u2V5hb1HXofX; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 16:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 415973A0D6B; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 16:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id hw6so22169182ejc.10; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 16:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UzzX9h0dWPbuDhce9KK81rSKF1Wyo8zPQjMatpt7DzY=; b=Vk7y+vBMd19dPqRN+XA68EZAVxHx0KBeZxXj4VtYe57Lixm6yJSVumNBOQXwq9ogDK EG7VvEuExhgs0PAMoRRE5hjToIMM3DquEuLaBdJmMZt+axl/ctvh1cGkCz+iFlGMuulE zYfFFKomr+58+g9rPcsVx8JWpY/eSdl/fTjSBmTUSvVgiYVXQmE+sKG5FyCpp7ClPQv+ Eoq8utVVd5Wfe1vQZs4D+PXFWyLae6P/vZk4RapBp5CBrtsD09rcXUAwyFejsC+70n1Y w6e6K4F/Te0Xc67SbWqfIiWqZnMXIRFjP4rTBCQwjVOrlMQWVfI9EMWsc1ll9OIg9MAq ojUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UzzX9h0dWPbuDhce9KK81rSKF1Wyo8zPQjMatpt7DzY=; b=MvJdYho+h6ZZ2FqYGMesE5wvPribcOK7xeNKADmKtl+d/OnZ/OUcitXCdL4TsP0bUE aFCdwmQ+jJfcJFYDWHrEcL143WLm4K75xGCqRusGm2rQ5XqA8ZsaZ7rqkoOaIHn2lsUD R+vRpn2XdHPw6W5/JS1kowG+Pcisda7LJbn9Bcz/y+QvSYyadVTDIF0sKA6vQ1i9lLgC BWplCDgHnubJT9e8N8LVftzPsOVKZqLJn/Y32JiHYXO1oBazOI0Svyjl/0NJbCWGqtqa XnOe6UR/oU/neToBaiZTZ+LSKCPAXbqD0Ho/Sjmr8wezDrjUt0ZuNm4U+z4ajP9Jvx0d AkVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DrjP+ezd3L4HFGFtmIiv8hFAvnF9oKUiD85lw8zm8p629k1pm l+HPIE6RdbQ7OpHEzqe04VYs2HSK5Fxcii3tXOw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzr8xQTQunauSWXKZXEgjkru7xu5dTbU1Fm5CFyeD1v+tGh/1PQIkLCprHfv+t21ZV1HKjSkiwS2hCbY85ZHFg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:318b:: with SMTP id 11mr2644983ejy.493.1628380678725; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 16:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <db8c1a5534e9412ebcfa37682d75f862@huawei.com> <C23D7023-B5B7-47C6-8AC5-65A98822A724@lurchi.franken.de> <CANMZLAZGawUjRhSSE_rA8AyqMx=mx1WFeJ_tZq0KVEXJd2XBfQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210807014730.GA28901@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAO42Z2yezZh5-B0PwCuNt2FUMAW-FjMK8QZ8uL4TsPhs26zziw@mail.gmail.com> <20210807151716.GA3098@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CALZ3u+a_7XQ+R8mV+9KzwRwxa0riP-QD_2R69ycV0NL9jy_S3Q@mail.gmail.com> <20210807175410.GA63079@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CALx6S36b33LD_hNFvptOJuny4g98=dhq3RtKsGeLx3ks-yYjFg@mail.gmail.com> <6F63D7FE-8768-4BD8-846E-61E50E44228F@lurchi.franken.de> <CALx6S36pbw2angEmDpu5DnX2nix9KgxFs7ExU17x+JXQFs23TA@mail.gmail.com> <CALZ3u+Yt2X3faSVW7K0eaxmaQy6iA6p4=f0c4E_F4CP0tfjHYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMHu9wSuG87_vBaGNY0oU0kMu9KPFPAwcP9+eFviCMErPg@mail.gmail.com> <CALZ3u+YRfWspGYbFPQQyEGBxsS+0VhSAZq4MHWnWrMaW1HU-tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMF2Vr1LRin0WpBTM6UeRfi4FGQUpgp0SX4G2ftvtm23mA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMF2Vr1LRin0WpBTM6UeRfi4FGQUpgp0SX4G2ftvtm23mA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 02:57:47 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+YkKDu65emDG9u2A1n2V-G+kxeWdOmkPsyYMc53sHRXoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/VHCXzbcqi0hoEw2h94Fgi7NxhhM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:58:06 -0000

Peace,

On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 2:47 AM Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> I recommend you spend a moment on RIPE BGP Play to observe how real life routing paths change to any anycast address sourced by more then one ASN.

I had maintained a completely anycast network for 10 consecutive
years, until 2021, with zero to no availability issues.  And, with no
modern features like "we've got anycast for dispatch only but we will
serve you a unicast address once you try to connect".
Is there anything new on the BGPlay for me in 2021 to take a look at
with that regard?  Please advise.

--
Töma

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email