IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-08.txt

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Fri, 22 November 2019 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363521208A1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:58:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LVl933NmSpV5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:58:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9A512088A for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:58:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E710C4B; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:58:40 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date :date:in-reply-to:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1574449118; bh=ePY99c8n1MSMLtA+gzqs3LuMakyy2NhFjqjJf69NUKg=; b=H RwNCuhBUc7HFZnEnM1FZxne8Um43x6yurC5CJeRvzir++VQHAurz9Vd5fAJAwXEd BQZZ43uqKqds7eOBGDfDGEc0V3RvOgBCmO/cWuJ2Ltz64OIwqTtMzdx6esn1fqQi 5UKqwHKPIT/1rxZbLGRflVEHfxq06Vr+rW98LHzGAE=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id oo9FCmNMIvOZ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:58:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:9495:859a:a7c7:652f] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:9495:859a:a7c7:652f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9934D49; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:58:38 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-08.txt
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <1cfd682f-d6bc-a697-38a7-933aa0485b8a@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:58:37 +0100
Cc: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D4436EF5-2B97-44A4-915D-EF7611590B51@steffann.nl>
References: <157422734071.5406.14331301768750185617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <851F7007-3DD5-42F3-8884-8842DA07EE53@cisco.com> <1cfd682f-d6bc-a697-38a7-933aa0485b8a@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/_As4IF_GBdiJsQT_I-nzNAhJReg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 18:58:46 -0000

Hi,

> What's the rationale for this document being "Informational"?
> 
> Documenting how folks are breaking the spec?

For that I think an Independent Submission is the only appropriate one. Anything in any IETF stream should either stick to existing specs or explicitly update them.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email