IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-08.txt

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 03:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1461208E3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:34:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VZTXGBmd7aqU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF8E120103 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.3.69] (unknown [186.137.78.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B64086AF4; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:34:29 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-08.txt
To: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
References: <157422734071.5406.14331301768750185617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <851F7007-3DD5-42F3-8884-8842DA07EE53@cisco.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <1cfd682f-d6bc-a697-38a7-933aa0485b8a@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:30:18 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <851F7007-3DD5-42F3-8884-8842DA07EE53@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xroiPo4Px28hygyigOuLN8z5mss>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:34:36 -0000

Hello, Darren,

On 21/11/19 00:32, Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote:
> Hello 6man Working Group.
> 
> This update has the following major changes:
> 1 - Revision 7 provided a normative definition of SRH insertion and removal.
> 2 - This rewrite shifts from the normative definition of SRH insertion within an SR Domain to a description of deployments of the same.
> 3 - Intended status has changed from proposed standard to informational.

What's the rationale for this document being "Informational"?

Documenting how folks are breaking the spec?

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email