IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24253C151094; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id usW-ovoGTd02; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98C0C15108F; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-29e0a1fd9a7so3500558a91.2; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712079892; x=1712684692; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gOoQ8qm17eGfTTnW5OFBvbFwelRk+bp+QEa9JrHlDF8=; b=TcgYQO0p02LcxH7OGTy52EZ2TgT6onQx4EHyPlAEOnlxhahvp3ByFLegWsAVsXpoLs 2GMM6bI/5zyoGwTHlBQ8w1aVVf8GxjbdHTJeFlsRGdOmEAFNeF3WDv36nHvzOY+TelbK 0y0F28OXhMaI+86Qv16wLpgxoNh3d0m/R8D8sqyCBgkX9uJDmBfzI/Ijyd/7cA5QhhJL txl5Fx7B6GCxY4m2qqePKV6sTlknXnxarwzyW4SL9jmCNQ7BY/3Z6o35TSHEDxa+iS1b s9ceSqjpeE1l4AWnZYqxdj2UaSuLrqIJYTddThnSvQhnp0ER7RyM8FT8K4nh/B+I8Ptr XeLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712079892; x=1712684692; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gOoQ8qm17eGfTTnW5OFBvbFwelRk+bp+QEa9JrHlDF8=; b=gnEv6G/ucwtppFQe+AEw/DnF/fqr4ARQLTKziS8rPfZH5Cfv3zNi7YlZ15JCv1wlnF 3W0TLClv5+YtSCSeChPX8P8wEmUxpImk6djrtpNt0M/jnRvK6WfBtdK7F57KfW+zg9gd M62648N+mM7837ysuZEDnWnVxuZIfNzSbaVnrVq6ClPDQhKqdyXKDiaxiw/Jsf6vnX5L KR4elnmA0ObDqxcWqZ9nvpKXwcX3Fj51N1YEFK9txkGwj3yRt2Jhj3OVgJvPfIa/le8w H90BTrime68wwV7AChc9ji1+77IsjMwBViSFdAnZa66cmjnBAlri1iQgpl8KPN00Qtw2 m13w==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXCCtEbzMEA0UpFORHg2Fbq/KS9URg07ZenC1A3Sk2KVLGWugR/6PS1ymRoagYjz4qDFJv8KMS7dSBEQiQgMOxW4M2G/l9H
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxSXoI2ffdusC9ofemmCFYqIqH2aOR46ARNPlwxZj6lrOVtUSv/ ZYDJ1dX48SUyNmmLB6MOymkT+Ndb3/x0LxUb0cia4fXv/VwtHbWNTawCXtwlRUKqMcknkemrz1H cvAVmWdzkIt5J6xTH8YXD13GfDKhsM/Rp
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGMeSL7V8VzNm7AKIe6b8cLsNhTwhxZtUKaPKC1YF2KpLHMB2TbO6+B0piIUvbb0CBDqF2my6sjs8YjpuRBFCY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a40d:b0:2a2:85a:454a with SMTP id y13-20020a17090aa40d00b002a2085a454amr382650pjp.31.1712079892342; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:44:51 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESszUUdDw-xnDtZKqz75g6SXZ+7mXtZujBKwN+hxypC-Kuw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMMESszUUdDw-xnDtZKqz75g6SXZ+7mXtZujBKwN+hxypC-Kuw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:44:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESswF_NnpK7_xk9OXmmocU8P7pne0gmPjCkapXEQVfQA2zQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf7349061520a9db"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ilE8ed_XGsEn55sVkQYkOu1mJIo>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:44:54 -0000

[Moving this conversation up on your mailbox. :-) ]

[Thanks, Robert and Tom for your input!]


We want to hear from more of you, including the authors. Even if you
already expressed your opinion in a different thread, please chime in here.

We will collect feedback until the end of this week.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On March 28, 2024 at 8:06:18 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.ietf@gmail.com)
wrote:


Focusing on the C-SID draft, some have suggested requiring the presence of
the SRH whenever C-SIDs are used. Please discuss whether that is the
desired behavior (or not) -- please be specific when debating the benefits
or consequences of either behavior.

Please keep the related (but independent) discussion of requiring the SRH
whenever SRv6 is used separate. This larger topic may impact several
documents and is better handled in a different thread (with 6man and spring
included).

Thanks!

Alvaro
-- for spring-chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email