IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 March 2024 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3AFC14F69F; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VYUymsIPEFqz; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A64C14F61D; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e04ac4209eso7229905ad.1; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711627579; x=1712232379; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QuZchwOcrgqtcI2MUkyLW2tuUPwKm981sMNOKlm1DJQ=; b=Pxada5rNWJLOm0yHnysfHYMbQTCv0bF0/IV0f8eN92g3pAE5zp+zBaQNEVoz30867K 694YyK1n/o4IIRgWnWZ32juEt7yNPztsuQzlR3S+JW3kqTYj8/fUrP1R9mbEhcUuv90D INm4CSw99+IiKMd/S076DKnOSq7VQ4YKXPfWwyni65akLYO5bssknRp3wrr58/qsROut pq9VtwnBof8VFC3MIAhsUDlwcaKyyto3Mxjf7faEecK1Wl/F4oJY7nrUbqZqsoDWWUV0 gCpFCUNxWlM/O3WA3RE0PTpXnOtKAv/9gVr45LkREPt7S1oGpUayl+Tg0zl5+1udKnM9 3d5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711627579; x=1712232379; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QuZchwOcrgqtcI2MUkyLW2tuUPwKm981sMNOKlm1DJQ=; b=pXiV6Ktlndd/cle3exYFcEV+PMCSnrX/4I8PC7Zo3DsEdFWFbmUuiRd1c0K+emwYAz IGNvKcZJoCTGrjGW6GbuLpQ+X9Mgpng8a6d2Aok5zJBjBrsMwlYdvN1uCwctEwl8oQSP ZE3HB0U3Gn3dq0mFmjk813hfI3KkgGIz/8cHzmzGImWWpA8kyijUEgc59spiQTGstv/z Zj/STkjkXCccp4zV85zQFqmW6wJSBxs0IZFJ44ib0pFdrVpSkX+MjO1UFJRxXHYig00g p3V29B0emx5/meX0YMEG6MmBHic4s395gTbYCidn58r5hgUL6hA5gG9fCC6/AcHiSlRM 46Sw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUjPwcdgI+BrbnqpPlqSf8NYKUYwZFVWK+0wzQBgme1XJl8YdYfizxQy+cIC++9/HOMTzGkVYuakyRw3bo2JpU4MHP33wfv
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw51Ljyvsx9pLiRSJIkOzfsXC/G954wmKUj0HRO8pJZFj4A5P9H ne8zkKOfGSTrCfSy5sqQ9HQ0eHI/BY6Nuy5Zw469fAejN5icwx4JUyyae78lxLC3zyRESygSVI+ /JYllAIGzKNY8DDGEQUbcmvkXEMscyJfo
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IESNqYVamjGlmuvLg54lNYPMZk+7ayzRWoPkvsSw7A1ijpVSQ30utPdtK/AWg3YdFR56k4kV8Fv3dUxXENHYUg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1246:b0:1e0:c7b6:ef4b with SMTP id u6-20020a170903124600b001e0c7b6ef4bmr2518144plh.24.1711627579443; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:06:18 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:06:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESszUUdDw-xnDtZKqz75g6SXZ+7mXtZujBKwN+hxypC-Kuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/tx-weTRZ882dt3ndIvXmh8MHsxc>
Subject: [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:06:21 -0000

Focusing on the C-SID draft, some have suggested requiring the
presence of the SRH whenever C-SIDs are used. Please discuss whether
that is the desired behavior (or not) -- please be specific when
debating the benefits or consequences of either behavior.

Please keep the related (but independent) discussion of requiring the
SRH whenever SRv6 is used separate. This larger topic may impact
several documents and is better handled in a different thread (with
6man and spring included).

Thanks!

Alvaro
-- for spring-chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email