IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 16 May 2020 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346053A086A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.213
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.213 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VpRnhUF7znpc for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CB63A0865 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.144.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 04G78Y52011470 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 May 2020 00:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1589612929; x=1589699329; i=@elandsys.com; bh=IoTPxONdY6Y7Yw8iwvLu9kACQQIgc1dM9Phiq2DeaBQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=SxjFDarryHVptbVRDX8qJkcHwJdliF5dfl1nEcpUSCR7uy+oK8Kr1jO73GIft4M9y uWYFAncBI3pJ7N+ZSMbSzUFz0DtOgYUnZ/4L627+77+7fzSGjD5evDZP/dPRIAsfLb hGbWsFcrV9/SUq3xPRIe32dBp5X435mNGEs82AV8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200516000435.106f80f0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 00:08:10 -0700
To: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, 6man@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: RE: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0
In-Reply-To: <91723b56299e435a8debefab60ffb834@huawei.com>
References: <23488ea0d4eb474c9d7155086f940dae@huawei.com> <006c01d62aa1$8c195520$a44bff60$@com> <DM6PR05MB634863122645FD4981B97F71AEBD0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <e4cfefa0-eeb4-22ee-6d9b-1abac21ce962@si6networks.com> <DM6PR05MB63486BC1056350B4E6B744FEAEBD0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <91723b56299e435a8debefab60ffb834@huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jOGj1tAnZ25fVnXi-oP2GfZkydE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 07:09:03 -0000

Hi Jingrong,
At 11:44 PM 15-05-2020, Xiejingrong (Jingrong) wrote:
>In my common sense, the security should not be dependent on any kind 
>of assumption like "you can't guess out the mapping", or "you don't 
>know the SID".
>Is there any theory or IETF BCP to state such principle ?

It is known as security by obscurity.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email