IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.txt

itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0) Fri, 11 May 2007 12:21 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmU7M-0000cx-Sy; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:21:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmU7L-0000cq-Lz for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:21:03 -0400
Received: from coconut.itojun.org ([2001:240:501:0:204:23ff:fecb:8908]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmU7L-0001QM-60 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:21:03 -0400
Received: by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id DE4241C04E; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:20:59 +0900 (JST)
to: ipv6@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 May 2007 14:16:41 +0200" <145F856D-2CD6-4964-8256-33D20B5336BD@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
References: <145F856D-2CD6-4964-8256-33D20B5336BD@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Cue version 0.8 (070406-1309/itojun)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <20070511122059.DE4241C04E@coconut.itojun.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:20:59 +0900
From: itojun@itojun.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

> Deprecating RH0 seems to be the only reasonable choice. I do not get  
> why some people want a 'disable by default' solution to this problem.  
> Do we need to explain one more time why RH0 MUST NOT be turned on ?

	cannot agree more.  you helped me sleep tight.

itojun

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email