Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.txt
"Ebalard, Arnaud" <Arnaud.Ebalard@eads.net> Fri, 11 May 2007 09:03 UTC
Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmR2K-0003h1-Bl; Fri, 11 May 2007 05:03:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmR2J-0003gw-D5 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 05:03:39 -0400
Received: from ns1.its.eads.net ([193.56.40.66] helo=mx1.its.eads.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmR2I-0005nB-07 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 05:03:39 -0400
Received: from fr-gate1.mailhub.intra.corp ([53.154.16.33]) by mx1.its.eads.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Fri, 11 May 2007 11:01:12 +0200
Received: from sfrsu800.hq.corp ([10.21.8.22]) by fr-gate1.mailhub.intra.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 11 May 2007 11:06:27 +0200
Received: from [172.16.23.99] (10.251.5.23 [10.251.5.23]) by gecko.hq.corp with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id H92ZL95V; Fri, 11 May 2007 11:03:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:03:30 +0200
Message-ID: <B8A8060D-5710-4477-80E5-6A4ADFDA6DC1@eads.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.txt
Thread-Index: AceTqz+u9QeFpPBESP+DdC6fGg+8XA==
From: "Ebalard, Arnaud" <Arnaud.Ebalard@eads.net>
To: JINMEI Tatuya / ???? <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2007 09:06:27.0491 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8419730:01C793AB]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1955701273=="
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Le 11 mai 07 à 04:24, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 a écrit : > Are you suggesting the following part should apply regardless of the > type of routing header? > > In particular, the value of the Segments Left field > MUST not be considered. > > If so, I don't think the current rh0 draft could be interpreted that > way (aside from whether we'd agree it in the first place). Nope. I just said it was in contradiction (meaning it updated the specification) with the following part of section 4.4 of RFC 2460: If Segments Left is zero, the node must ignore the Routing header and proceed to process the next header in the packet, whose type is identified by the Next Header field in the Routing header. If Segments Left is non-zero, the node must discard the packet and send an ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 0, message to the packet's Source Address, pointing to the unrecognized Routing Type. as updated system will have to protect themselves from the remaining source routed packets bounced by unpatched waypoints that still forward RH0. RH0 will be a specific RH type for which stacks will not look at the Segments Left field to select the behavior (meaning will not end processing the UL if Segments Left is 0). By the way, for the proposal of replying with an ICMPv6 message for RH0 packets whose destination address in the main IPv6 header is one of the node, I think it's fair to do it independently of Segments Left field, i.e. as soon as the type is 0 (better said than let implicit). a+ -- Arnaud Ebalard EADS Innovation Works - IT Sec Research Engineer PGP KeyID:047A5026 FingerPrint:47EB85FEB99AAB85FD0946F30255957C047A5026
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.txt Jeroen Massar
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Joe Abley
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Pekka Savola
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Ebalard, Arnaud
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Brian Haberman
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Jari Arkko
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Jeroen Massar
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Pekka Savola
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Ebalard, Arnaud
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Jeroen Massar
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Ebalard, Arnaud
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… George V. Neville-Neil
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… David Malone
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Joe Abley
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… gnn
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… David Malone
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Ebalard, Arnaud
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Ebalard, Arnaud
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Guillaume Valadon / ギョーム バラドン
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Guillaume Valadon / ギョーム バラドン
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… George V. Neville-Neil
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… David Malone
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Tim Enos
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Ebalard, Arnaud
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… David Malone
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Joe Abley
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Joe Abley
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… David Malone
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… Guillaume Valadon / ギョーム バラドン
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.t… David Malone
- Routing Header Type 0 way forward Brian Haberman