RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-04.txt

Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> Fri, 10 July 2015 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F171A024E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNoxD2R0e0lA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0715.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:715]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F511A024C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BN1PR0301MB0644.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.171.17) by BN1PR0301MB0644.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.171.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.207.19; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:25:24 +0000
Received: from BN1PR0301MB0644.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.171.17]) by BN1PR0301MB0644.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.171.17]) with mapi id 15.01.0207.004; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:25:23 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-6man-1b@u-1.phicoh.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-04.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQuwfuu7JKjx9450CSzMagYMqCT53U89nA
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:25:23 +0000
Message-ID: <BN1PR0301MB0644AD1FFBF3E85C49CD4047A89F0@BN1PR0301MB0644.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20150626053554.16572.72663.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <926657903.827241.1435374995889.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <5591BF9C.8080307@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2zf5-g1aOAWfaDxX47H9w9Kyc0QEX+0oKyzL9nwzCb_DQ@mail.gmail.com> <5592370E.6070705@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2xacdABghT5W269V9y3aucmh2QQd6AHNLK+MpsaLzeB8g@mail.gmail.com> <55931DAE.8000701@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2ywMEfXKSSFeSd5DNvEW4URfmTKvaWgxNw6odXRHWW=Jw@mail.gmail.com> <559378AE.70506@si6networks.com> <CABOxzu0WkrFv9a-jjc7Txzg_ronsMucKXsu_7X+mfHyoVFZz0Q@mail.gmail.com> <559AB1CD.6000605@si6networks.com> <CABOxzu2iy8XBbCDv33ZKoA9VcfFj1f9FfVTv88=fSsM7krxguw@mail.gmail.com> <DM2PR0301MB0655C36E42E9EA90BCB1548DA8930@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <559AF8D0.405@si6networks.com> <m1ZCnUO-0000G3C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <559D87CD.7040707@gmail.com> <m1ZD8Ry-0000CSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <559EDD5A.3070509@gmail.com> <m1ZDUfM-0000CTC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1ZDUfM-0000CTC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: u-1.phicoh.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [131.107.192.127]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN1PR0301MB0644; 5:SOP6EwVeqYHg4jBjJcAAyfkpfQtWaHm9V+YvhsbvgzYXHk6OF9bERREz7EEpztY4vN3dnuzK94pb9WEhkZ8DSN4KoisQi6ks9+HyIAStsTtGtnkLZz0Y/7GnVgA9icjvCf7aMh16mtv2t50uy5OPlw==; 24:0peBZrfzSLOHLHOvuJwtZeNlRkKP129efVPxAzO6WUaCts0W/uc+QkhIytXOATn3HSQHhu2t3YY2pOXnSETb+Ezd0VRF6rxMeplYwjY39G4=; 20:yymioBEmFLN0+DG9oTon/wcLiRaNfnj5fYCiWmq8j4toGCbfF2uTeU1zmISs28CalLtuap9lwwZ604r3hdQegQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0644;
x-o365ent-eop-header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN1PR0301MB06449F1416C9689486DAFBCCA89F0@BN1PR0301MB0644.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0644; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0644;
x-forefront-prvs: 06339BAE63
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(24454002)(62966003)(2950100001)(77156002)(2900100001)(5003600100002)(92566002)(2501003)(5002640100001)(66066001)(77096005)(15975445007)(102836002)(19580395003)(33656002)(86362001)(122556002)(74316001)(40100003)(76576001)(76176999)(189998001)(50986999)(54356999)(5001770100001)(5001960100002)(87936001)(107886002)(2656002)(93886004)(230783001)(106116001)(46102003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0644; H:BN1PR0301MB0644.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jul 2015 17:25:23.8559 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1PR0301MB0644
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vZSqDLWbvUjO_hzDRyzAXkh8FL0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:25:44 -0000

On Friday, July 10, 2015, 2:32 AM, Philip Homburg wrote:
> ...
> 
> I'm curious how randomized link layer addresses interact with RFC 7217. At first
> reading it seems that RFC 7217 would defeat randomized link layer addresses.

You may want to check https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-6man-random-addresses/.

-- Christian Huitema