Re: [ire] New version (4) of the spec and new draft on DNRD (1)

["Gould, James" <[e-mail]>]

Francisco,

EPP is the provisioning protocol for the systems that you are going to
escrow, so naturally it is the basis in determining the set of fields and
intent of the fields to escrow.  I don't believe you can separate the two
in the discussion. 

-- 

JG
 

 
James Gould
Principal Software Engineer
[e-mail]
 
703-948-3271 (Office)
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
VerisignInc.com







On 12/14/12 1:29 PM, "Francisco Obispo" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>On Dec 14, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Francisco Obispo <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>>> You can't simply add text that doesn't exist and then
>>> include that text in a data escrow draft that is based on your
>>> interpretation.
>
>BTW, the fact that Arias, and Noguchi decided to use the EPP format as a
>guideline, is plausible, but if you are correct but what is needed is the
>registrar/client and not the individual user information, then the
>requirement in the escrow needs to reflect what is needed and not what
>the EPP protocol says.
>
>I'm just trying to say that one protocol is not bound to the other, and
>if that was the case, we would not be discussing XML over CSV or
>viceversa.
>
>
>Francisco Obispo 
>Director of Applications and Services - ISC
>email: [e-mail]
>Phone: [phone] || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC
>PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE
>