IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ire] New version (4) of the spec and new draft on DNRD (1)

Francisco Obispo <fobispo@isc.org> Fri, 14 December 2012 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fobispo@isc.org>
X-Original-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1855721F8A75 for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:34:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iy1MbV51kiJH for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:33:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20AE21F8A6C for <ire@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:33:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF8DC9493; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:33:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fobispo@isc.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=dkim2012; t=1355510037; bh=ilkMsg+SmNLH8U886VX9XCoaR682/DXbcgJqDOM7bM8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=d9fZYH1UQf/ermM6sE1p9sJ4Y6S1flVnIgMEdsiuunIt0SFPAtTBktUmkUKuCaTYM asrt5EVqDjTl7udcjlLJ84kxMN1Ot+BFr0w56fwb2fE8BTlA9b2AOnTWfLjx7FsERQ tt+MV7+XRfn1XPodcGJPJ5UfwQNFlkUJC+MMgLxI=
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:33:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fobispo@isc.org)
Received: from [192.168.255.120] (c-24-7-39-79.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.7.39.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 098F9216C3D; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:33:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fobispo@isc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Francisco Obispo <fobispo@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6C873C@BRN1WNEXMBX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:33:53 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <52028659-1C67-4D62-9927-354A2A02F751@isc.org>
References: <C41D7AF7FCECBE44940E9477E8E70D7A0D7437F6@BRN1WNEXMBX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <148D81EC-63B1-4C71-B630-B50686BE82B4@isc.org> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6C873C@BRN1WNEXMBX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-DCC--Metrics: post.isc.org; whitelist
Cc: "ire@ietf.org" <ire@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ire] New version (4) of the spec and new draft on DNRD (1)
X-BeenThere: ire@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internet Registration Escrow discussion list." <ire.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ire>
List-Post: <mailto:ire@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:34:00 -0000

On Dec 14, 2012, at 10:29 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:

> The EPP fields are intended to capture the value of the <clID> element provided with the <login> command of the client (in the context of a client-server relationship) that performed the create or update action. The clID, crID, and upID values don't tell you anything about the client's role.

So clID -> Sposoring Client, which means: a user that was able to login via an EPP <login> command, which is consider to sponsor the domain name right?

Which means that crID == clID that registered the domain name

and

upID => clID that last updated the domain name

I don't see any ambiguity here.



Francisco Obispo 
Director of Applications and Services - ISC
email: fobispo@isc.org
Phone: +1 650 423 1374 || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC
PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email