Re: [irtf-discuss] [Icn-interest] Draft ICN RG Charter

Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu> Thu, 26 May 2011 08:17 UTC

Return-Path: <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E37E067B for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aSqLTXbjFfY7 for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44667E0671 for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6A82C000148; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:17:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office.hd)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOGHyf2tbDGG; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:17:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3D3382C00008C; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:17:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (ENCELADUS.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E722C000148; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:16:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.225]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:16:50 +0200
From: Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>
To: "icn-interest@listserv.netlab.nec.de" <icn-interest@listserv.netlab.nec.de>
Thread-Topic: [Icn-interest] Draft ICN RG Charter
Thread-Index: AQHMGTxrvltMJilX+kKiz2CyondNKZSb1viAgALu9eA=
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:16:48 +0000
Message-ID: <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F524905B43F87@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <DC91B532-727D-428C-889F-4669268D46BB@ericsson.com> <4DDBB0D7.5080006@mhof.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DDBB0D7.5080006@mhof.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.2.105]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "irtf-discuss@irtf.org" <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] [Icn-interest] Draft ICN RG Charter
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/irtf-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:17:07 -0000

Markus,

> What about including a summary of the expected benefits of ICN, i.e.
> first describe the *problem* to be solved in *quantifiable* terms, then
> describe the main concepts and continue on to the research challenges.

Thanks, good point.

I'd preferably do that in more detail, in a problem statement draft, but I agree that the charter should ideally provide at least a summary for that.

Best regards,

Dirk