Re: [irtf-discuss] [arch-d] [Aid-workshop-pc] Why closed IAB workshops ? Re: Call for Papers: Workshop on Analyzing IETF Data (AID), 2021

Brad Biddle <brad@biddle.law> Sun, 29 August 2021 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <brad@biddle.law>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718103A27A6 for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_DOTEDU=1, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=biddle-law.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JyLO5V76okol for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1DD3A279E for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id m19so7628440vsj.10 for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=biddle-law.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T2NDY5cHcAMgocofcw8rO38uSfjBi1b2aNmqO1B9USo=; b=N1xAJVOtnD3GcmgzBHi+ZTba7Qb5T6n1btJLJmav6SioitdCLBHG8+L8YRg/6DW2iL o2Do5V9VJ9t8e07Lkdj++YLRZCIBs6IY0YEKdFkXTQK8MF3xP+KRAqjS1z9jjsqos24x hRy2yTprIOgpIjrbFqziElOTz9ziE58mVuEieUwb5Jd1Qss1jfXNTBAtIJqMS5QaV0Oy 1XlD5Ivx3zDmjfJQea9S1sJWfTjjBPO+3IkQ+3YG/1O0pZuIogS8xiDQTjY7ZyY9jr2O hIqr/Cpvjpy+qLPhHd6vHjfIUqFLrob4aiunnnSCpZI68gx2Fxo1K6Vo5mh1ALic2S3l 2xQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T2NDY5cHcAMgocofcw8rO38uSfjBi1b2aNmqO1B9USo=; b=QozQfm0Q05hJPy7vmHyKPz6TzdmMarD4copbtLyy//9j8muBZXk3kXeD7L07p9cvi5 UloHck1o7QUZo6aKrgI0F4poYIiF6Qrfc0I56guEzsFButbeUzu83NWMFLh5yHmB+cta 3SQQaDVZSRrqTNhf5vUavI71CnSFj8piQNNRhGbJLiMue5V0+wKHq672DT+thXTCYMKL AQjGwiETJay5Uyl87UQ2aEU9ZRYwVG76QbTH+wbovu61wfkAKeM5MPSbGXft+gEt7Tmc Sh+qXjSUYppEXQKKwpCz2/wobM4Ae1QDheuKvIVjq36PwR0U4A1QjujufaGHvLC0elp+ 5IWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Qslug7gkXDd9FmhWtUIpEc8FmeNHaP+IMgCnomiy79EddzmDO KPBxoGxYs8MD017f4iAsk0dr2tqv99xOqlwUHBQE8Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWx3EFTEJSI7T7r7xVT8YWtxZcCDEJQDJ65e1lg9iSb4xxj1pZHcAiMaPiyTYma+80/7cW5qS4A8nj/NKAiYk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:b0e:: with SMTP id b14mr11019540vst.55.1630196069476; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CBAEDD86-0AE5-4765-98BE-8543F660F1E3@gmail.com> <39EBCAC2-D929-4E58-986F-EBDAFAD25BAA@kuehlewind.net> <44E8C862-AA4C-4372-92FC-0C0555613758@akamai.com> <20210827163527.GB5429@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20210828181054.GA3974@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAPdOjkgHL8R77zfuQ1vyR2q95NPVqywY83Oqz=L0hp0Bo9QPyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPdOjkgHL8R77zfuQ1vyR2q95NPVqywY83Oqz=L0hp0Bo9QPyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brad Biddle <brad@biddle.law>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:13:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPdOjkhn-Nep-5sgwdthmFuhhbyxkTedPgKaNHUZAacYHQt0VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "irtf-discuss@irtf.org" <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>, "aid-workshop-pc@iab.org" <aid-workshop-pc@iab.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a2c55305caa7993a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/mNVnB51ljycoS0YXT7rF3FCGJ1I>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 06:26:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] [arch-d] [Aid-workshop-pc] Why closed IAB workshops ? Re: Call for Papers: Workshop on Analyzing IETF Data (AID), 2021
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 00:14:38 -0000

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 5:08 PM Brad Biddle <brad@biddle.law> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:13 AM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>
>> I am still be interested to learn if/how IAB did vet its invitation only
>> workshop
>> rules with the IEF lawyer re. compliance with USA EAR rules.
>>
>
> Toerless and all -- one of the IETF's lawyers here. Without inviting lots
> of nuanced discussion of a complex legal topic on large public mailing
> lists, let me note that materials presented at "open conferences" are
> broadly exempted from the EARs, and the definition of open conference is
> reasonably broad -- e.g., it can include "a limitation on actual
> attendance, as long as attendees either are the first who have applied or
> are selected on the basis of relevant scientific or technical competence,
> experience, or responsibility," among other things.
>
> The regulatory language is frustratingly opaque, but please see 15 CFR
> 734.2 [1]
>


Typo in my text: 15 CFR 734.7 is the relevant regulation. The footnoted
link is correct.



> and a relevant BIS FAQ [2]. Also let me assure you that export control
> compliance is a key focus area for the legal team and we would definitely
> flag any concerns for the IAB leadership and other stakeholders.
>
> --Brad
> --
> Brad Biddle | brad@biddle.law | +1.503.502.1259 (mobile) |
> http://biddle.law
>
> [1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/15/734.7
> [2]
> https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/compliance-training/export-administration-regulations-training/1554-ear-definitions-faq/file
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Cheers
>>     Toerless
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 06:35:27PM +0200, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>> > Hmm... can not remember i saw that being mentionined in invites. Do you
>> rmember
>> > an example one ?
>> >
>> > How does that work with USA EAR ? Or where participants already
>> excluded based on EAR ?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >     Toerless
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 04:29:40PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> > > The few workshops I have attended (four or five) were all under
>> Chatham House rules, to enable frank and open discussion among those
>> present.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Architecture-discuss mailing list
>> > Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> tte@cs.fau.de
>>
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Brad Biddle | brad@biddle.law | +1.503.502.1259 (mobile) | http://biddle.law