[Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- Section 5, third paragraph:

Can you offer any guidance on timeliness? At least an order of
magnitude?
.
Nits:

-- Please expand IS-IS on first mention in the body, even though you
already did in the abstract.

-- Section 5, 2nd paragraph: "The implementation SHOULD also allow
   operators to control the configuration of ’send’ and/or ’verify’ the
   feature of IS-IS PDUs for the links and for the node."

I don't understand the sentence